1 Return-Path: <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE69C40BFD3
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id mbPdlZdLvCCe for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from defaultvalue.org (li12-156.members.linode.com [70.85.129.156])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E150940BD85
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
21 by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D1090D34;
\r
22 Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:53:42 -0500 (CDT)
\r
23 Received: from raven.defaultvalue.org (raven.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7])
\r
24 by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EE550392;
\r
25 Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:53:42 -0500 (CDT)
\r
26 Received: by raven.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
27 id E108E7C400D; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:53:41 -0500 (CDT)
\r
28 From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
\r
29 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
30 Subject: Re: [notmuch] loss of duplicate messages
\r
31 References: <878wb7wsnt.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
32 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:53:41 -0500
\r
33 In-Reply-To: <878wb7wsnt.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> (Jameson Rollins's
\r
34 message of "Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:31:34 -0500")
\r
35 Message-ID: <87iq26mru2.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>
\r
36 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
\r
38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
39 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
42 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
43 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
44 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
45 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
46 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
47 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
48 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
49 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
51 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:53:54 -0000
\r
53 jrollins at finestructure.net (Jameson Rollins) writes:
\r
55 > I'm not exactly sure what the correct behavior is here, but I would
\r
56 > actually like to see my messages sent to the list returned to me.
\r
57 > It's a way of verifying that they did go to the list, as well as
\r
58 > getting a feeling for the round trip time. I personally wouldn't mind
\r
59 > just seeing both copies of the message returned by notmuch, as I can
\r
60 > just delete one of them if I don't want it to turn up again. Would
\r
61 > this behavior be problematic in any way? Do folks have suggestions of
\r
62 > other behaviors that might get around this problem?
\r
64 I'm not sure what the current plan is, but please consider this a
\r
65 belated agreement. It doesn't necessarily need to be the default (and
\r
66 perhaps shouldn't be), but I'd like to have some way to ask notmuch for
\r
67 *all* matching messages (regardless of message id) -- perhaps via an
\r
68 --include-duplicates argument to search/show/count, etc.
\r
73 rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
\r
74 GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
\r