1 Return-Path: <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B584196F2
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL=1.31] autolearn=no
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id XEk5d2lyWRS9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com (e28smtp02.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.2])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1F7431FC1
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from d28relay05.in.ibm.com (d28relay05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.62])
\r
21 by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o3Q6Llpg010500
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:51:47 +0530
\r
23 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67])
\r
24 by d28relay05.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
\r
26 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:51:47 +0530
\r
27 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
\r
28 by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id
\r
30 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:21:47 +1000
\r
31 Received: from skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com ([9.124.35.158])
\r
32 by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id
\r
33 o3Q6LkLA012791; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:21:46 +1000
\r
34 From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
\r
35 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
36 Subject: Re: Wrapping up the 0.3 release
\r
37 In-Reply-To: <87ljcchnfc.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
38 References: <87ljcchnfc.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-187-g7c5f017 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.50.1
\r
41 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:51:46 +0530
\r
42 Message-ID: <8739yi91j9.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
\r
44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
49 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
57 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:21:53 -0000
\r
59 On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:37:11 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
\r
60 > I pushed hard to get most everything we wanted for 0.3 done yesterday,
\r
61 > (which was one week since 0.2). I think we're still within the tolerance
\r
62 > of my published "about a week" schedule, but I would like to wrap things
\r
65 > Here are the features that I still have left in my queue at this point:
\r
67 > * improve from-header guessing
\r
69 > Dirk is looking into fixing a segfault found by the test suite here
\r
71 > * Fcc, Maildir, and Emacs message-mode -- a bit of code
\r
73 > This is next on my list to apply. Thanks for the extra testing!
\r
75 > There are a few other features that people had proposed but that didn't
\r
76 > pass review yet. If people follow-up with those quickly, they can still
\r
77 > go in. Otherwise, there's another new merge window coming up soon!
\r
79 > Meanwhile, I'm aware of two regressions I'd like to see fixed before
\r
82 > * Reply is now splitting the window
\r
84 > We're copying the original message into the new reply buffer, so
\r
85 > what's the advantage of splitting here?
\r
87 This actually have a disadvantage that after sending the mail i have to
\r
88 explicitly kill the buffer
\r
92 > * Composing a new message with 'm' brings up headers in a scrambled
\r
95 > A minor point, but it would be nice to fix this.
\r
97 > Finally, any of the tweaks I suggested to notmuch-hello mode would be
\r
98 > quite welcome. I might take a whack at some of these.
\r
100 > Then, there's the task of writing up NEWS. Dirk started helping with
\r
101 > that, which I appreciate. If anyone else wants to write up descriptions
\r
102 > of their favorite features that have been merged, that would be great.
\r
104 Another issue i found was
\r
107 * A thread with only one message doesn't show the message body by
\r
108 default. I need to use 'h' key binding to show the message
\r
109 body. Multiple message thread seems to work fine.
\r