Re: Batch tagging - add id_list as tag possible?
[notmuch-archives.git] / be / a19768522bd78cc7034f8a04ce19aec4a908b0
1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900D7431FB6\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 02:35:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.09\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id BB5HexwXE8wv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Tue, 22 Mar 2011 02:35:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com\r
19         [208.97.132.202])\r
20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63FF431FB5\r
21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 02:35:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
22 Received: from homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
23         by homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA1B7A8063;\r
24         Tue, 22 Mar 2011 02:35:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject\r
26         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
27         content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=TOtLAKbvNbDX9Acl9SQU34Ux9MS\r
28         lXYzhsu2YvOFrI3Bqy7YtS2b5ioCmjMD/KZymsAGTq1ehuiq+hsYteL5Ifd/K4y/\r
29         n3DVO+qlZk/7gTswRa+L+ouk6PrGnzdaoYjfYiVXeyx4naAArBQ2ljH1Kadt/oSa\r
30         SpghEhAKiHwDSMxI=\r
31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to\r
32         :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
33         content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=0c+D4r2fzU9eMQvIg6m/fu/OOyQ=; b=Q\r
34         w0Z5jCbIwtzfvuTdEnGVf0iK1H9O10DEJfdSEmae8pyRTvTPVGpLLn4nxJUU9HxI\r
35         gyVosd90Ri2TR+o2wYmElo3CZngsFTUuzwHlrouVVwLjAQeH9/BSd3mrol+zamIT\r
36         Zv8LGahWbLgrYWkqEnfzzxSOswSsfPRCkWaunwnFEE=\r
37 Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (mtec-hg-docking-2-dhcp-148.ethz.ch\r
38         [82.130.121.148]) (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de)\r
39         by homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C74607A805C; \r
40         Tue, 22 Mar 2011 02:35:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
41 Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);\r
42         Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:35:18 +0100\r
43 From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
44 To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
45         Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>,\r
46         Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
47 Subject: Re: problem with folder: search in python bindings\r
48 In-Reply-To: <87ei609wuj.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
49 References: <87tyf4xmm1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
50         <87aagv2z92.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
51         <87y64dk9da.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
52         <877hbsfq4q.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
53         <871v20bfij.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87tyewtobx.fsf@gogo.home>\r
54         <87hbaw9y3e.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87oc54tlou.fsf@gogo.home>\r
55         <87ei609wuj.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
56 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-133-g9450314 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.50.1\r
57         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
58 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:35:17 +0100\r
59 Message-ID: <87mxknebvu.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
60 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
61 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
62         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
63 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
64 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
65 Precedence: list\r
66 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
67         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
68 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
69         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
70 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
71 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
72 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
73 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
74         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
75 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:35:23 -0000\r
76 \r
77 --=-=-=\r
78 \r
79 On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:01:24 -0700, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
80 > Oh good call, Jesse.  Bonus points for you!  That was the problem.  Damn\r
81 > it.  In retrospect that's so obvious, though, isn't it!  I had purged\r
82 > the notmuch binary package, but had accidentally left libnotmuch1 and\r
83 > libnotmuch-dev installed.  Removing those packages and pointing to my\r
84 > locally installed libraries fixed the problem.\r
85 \r
86 Pfeww, I was getting very scared that the python bindings have serious\r
87 flaws that I am not aware of. Don't ever do that again to me :-).\r
88 \r
89 Glad you could sort it out. Unfortunately it is not easy to tease out\r
90 the path of the libnotmuch being used, otherwise we could debug-output\r
91 it.\r
92 \r
93 Sebastian\r
94 \r
95 --=-=-=\r
96 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
97 \r
98 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
99 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
100 \r
101 iEYEARECAAYFAk2IbVUACgkQVYX1jMgnoGLzkQCfTvzEPbKytOtDFb0MmyeZwdwW\r
102 iLQAn0+cdVnAWWsUZUkEK0TSQSm2BVeK\r
103 =wlRM\r
104 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
105 --=-=-=--\r