1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA4E429E29
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id C9NAIAzW3CwR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcagg.dreamhost.com
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1409B431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415947A8063;
\r
24 Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:cc:subject
\r
26 :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
27 content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=funvtkectfu6kSX5eWMyP3la5jG
\r
28 s0GEP2jmj4OLC1Lg5XKFwuSIdZKkXXUJBXf99oSY9JtQlw9nQRhvpmrqkwLLHQtq
\r
29 BCM/JPEio9tAA7HwkPaAhkPmiJ+Ji+lXx0GxLJIE0YBgEzIlxM274w24Q5LYhg9c
\r
31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:cc
\r
32 :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
33 content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=7bRB9Mn0+1PIM3W+Kfw4mJzyCK4=; b=N
\r
34 S5vHm/7jtmE/v1OHlaJB1naOxULGIePVoXQLbbbhkY8qeLOCNbSXgxzWHYG8Y0BD
\r
35 jRIGGCbFLZARpFBtN8MNBHjgsvE5OtGsBUQrSisJAEWlLFxvVDhW/Apt6ICZYke7
\r
36 Iv0yVW7his34yGbxLL7Z8/usakbPo0aktK0Ba18z/I=
\r
37 Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (unknown [62.48.121.245])
\r
38 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
39 (No client certificate requested)
\r
40 (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de)
\r
41 by homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2238C7A8060;
\r
42 Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
\r
43 Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
\r
44 Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:54:09 +0200
\r
45 From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
46 To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>,
\r
47 Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>
\r
48 Subject: Re: [python] segfaults at Message.get_date
\r
49 In-Reply-To: <87hb7m5f4s.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
50 References: <20110616215439.GA26997@brick> <87boxxq833.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
51 <20110617161024.GA8154@optimusprime>
\r
52 <87hb7n300m.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87hb7m5f4s.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
53 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-233-gb404931 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
54 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
55 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:53:57 +0200
\r
56 Message-ID: <87boxt3m9m.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
58 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
59 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
60 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
61 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
62 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
64 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
65 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
66 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
67 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
68 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
69 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
70 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
71 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
72 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
73 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:54:42 -0000
\r
77 On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:45:07 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
\r
78 > Sebastian, are you able to reproduce the issue? A python script that
\r
79 > triggers the bug, perhaps? I would look at this if I can reproduce the
\r
82 No, not reproducable at all. I only had it twice actually. Patrick had it
\r
83 several times but he can't reliably reproduce either.
\r
88 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
90 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
91 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
93 iEYEARECAAYFAk3+DYYACgkQVYX1jMgnoGLTmQCaAlE4dg5S04Pm7NkSku0YVPMQ
\r
94 sggAn0JMmLksU+Rl6ShdXf8BLRhSClid
\r
96 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r