1 Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C891431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:16:09 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id FY8eN-EQqq3U for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:16:07 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5DF4431FAF
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:16:07 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net
\r
23 ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet)
\r
24 by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa
\r
25 (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72)
\r
26 (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
\r
27 id 1TaQGf-0003R6-M7; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:16:02 -0400
\r
28 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)
\r
29 (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
\r
30 id 1TaQGa-000481-4b; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:15:56 -0400
\r
31 From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
32 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
33 Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
34 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] cli: add stub for insert command
\r
35 In-Reply-To: <871ujz6a19.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
36 References: <1343223767-9812-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>
\r
37 <871ujz6a19.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+75~g984212d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1
\r
39 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
40 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:15:56 -0400
\r
41 Message-ID: <87fw457pqb.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
49 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
57 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:16:09 -0000
\r
59 Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:
\r
61 > This is an interesting series, but let me play devil's advocate for a
\r
62 > moment: Why is this functionality needed? What can this functionality
\r
63 > do that notmuch new can't? Or how is it better? I feel like everything
\r
64 > that this series does can be done with notmuch new, post-new hooks, and
\r
65 > folder searches. Does this makes things more efficient in some way?
\r
68 One thing that Austin mentioned is that (roughly speaking) notmuch-new
\r
69 has no good way of dealing with duplicate message id's, so that might be
\r
70 another reason to integrate this functionality.
\r