1 Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DAF42119E
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:14:31 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id EBGp0nWT05Yx for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:14:30 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8496B421192
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:14:30 -0800 (PST)
\r
21 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])
\r
22 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA342125A;
\r
23 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:14:27 +0100 (CET)
\r
24 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
\r
25 :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id
\r
26 :mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=hnxYU5ciHx4Hma/uPD1IYb
\r
27 +3RUs=; b=EP/wrzI4yN9vFUB8fuQnH5kJU4MPwnGIudz505OcNN4f2KJd4RVWJ0
\r
28 rxgYx7GQIgO8Smol7gHrTC+k+5UPjAHLRJ2Ulb+I9Qi3iqKkKkm5QYNS3Px96918
\r
29 c0q2rALCxHYyUUXlKXASoRCDwwvfVA17cxVVlHxbW4bDcf6dHAe/o=
\r
30 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
\r
31 :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id
\r
32 :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=UuFgGy9tEHUZy5YW
\r
33 UIT1sSftNOrnCnu10n2Ovv8xSt/ywieGsExMKaefWa2xQxCW5ybBqFrrtiCVxwEI
\r
34 FG8/ZPxKeQlbVYSRcJdwS9MXGiY9znMnUkOE4jnTyPMAs7+V/EpSvnrj19JgsdM0
\r
35 fuE/ms9hToCXMSA1nTm4JoJOM2o=
\r
36 Received: from maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net
\r
38 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
39 (No client certificate requested)
\r
40 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
\r
41 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:14:27 +0100 (CET)
\r
42 From: Xavier Maillard <xavier@maillard.im>
\r
43 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
44 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
45 Subject: Re: on deleting messages
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <87vcoaywyu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
47 References: <87vcoaywyu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
49 (i486-slackware-linux-gnu)
\r
50 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:31:50 +0100
\r
51 Message-ID: <m2sjje3qqx.fsf@kcals.intra.maillard.im>
\r
53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
57 Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
59 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:14:31 -0000
\r
71 On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:01:45 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
75 > Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the following
\r
76 > patch set implements thread and message delete keys.
\r
78 > This is the last I'm going to comment on this issue. If we don't want
\r
79 > to support this, we should put together something on the wiki that
\r
80 > states we don't want to support it and that users should just bind it
\r
81 > themselves (with a nice explanation how), so that we can try to reduce
\r
82 > the number of future patches on the issue.
\r
84 I think this is something every (new) users are expecting to have: a
\r
85 simple and sensible way "to list the trashed messages". So I'd go for
\r