b5/3557789e8306f522a02df27aeefd141c29cb7e

   1 Return-Path: <dominik.epple@googlemail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F63B431FC0\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:30:31 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
   9         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  10         with ESMTP id n8yfeTYoljsi for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  11         Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:30:30 -0800 (PST)\r
  12 Received: from mail-yw0-f200.google.com (mail-yw0-f200.google.com\r
  13         [209.85.211.200])\r
  14         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667B6431FAE\r
  15         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:30:30 -0800 (PST)\r
  16 Received: by ywh38 with SMTP id 38so4945617ywh.6\r
  17         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:30:30 -0800 (PST)\r
  18 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
  19         d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;\r
  20         h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references\r
  21         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;\r
  22         bh=EzpUNdpNvUz1kIRvLOZ4zE7eJTx7Bu6vD0LLchJSUck=;\r
  23         b=AMip8UgGsV9fnYnmd9qjv5swcKBnYUV0uvb2MMqzMcI40JJYIXi94oRKi+otLU/a/t\r
  24         aEcB8XZfUp/bNVO56hUGRoZ/pmlJFfMo5+XxGQDfM4b3A+Q235xP3sT5LkNCe6Abm3av\r
  25         ZAnhISX5fgyIY4QxP7vBFOLtMAYn4flGqu9uU=\r
  26 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;\r
  27         h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
  28         :cc:content-type;\r
  29         b=QWe1ww+yjei2TCGNiLcD5ZNATB267YdOmnNDhReWEnK76rOdySGy2N2ypQxsNsIZgs\r
  30         VtEHWTMLvgt87/hCE6NEROM2Rrz6wSN1D/xPrysVcsne4C/1UWOnGh6J8a8ki7DBPY92\r
  31         Jhb6kpDgcFpLmWkn8aaVcC/xAi6z5ZhjtT1FY=\r
  32 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  33 Received: by 10.90.12.19 with SMTP id 19mr6640983agl.96.1258990229878; Mon, 23\r
  34         Nov 2009 07:30:29 -0800 (PST)\r
  35 In-Reply-To: <877htlmbhu.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  36 References: <123554aa0911200056h73def158pb0db64a2a78ed687@mail.gmail.com>\r
  37         <877htlmbhu.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  38 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:30:29 +0100\r
  39 Message-ID: <123554aa0911230730t72d36378rd45459462496034a@mail.gmail.com>\r
  40 From: Dominik Epple <dominik.epple@googlemail.com>\r
  41 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>\r
  42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
  43 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  44 Subject: Re: [notmuch] notmuch new: Memory problem\r
  45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
  47 Precedence: list\r
  48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  49         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  51         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  56         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  57 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:30:31 -0000\r
  58 \r
  59 Hi,\r
  60 \r
  61 Thanks for your help. Here is the information you requested:\r
  62 \r
  63 2009/11/20 Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>:\r
  64 > I'm curious how big your .notmuch directory ended up after this\r
  65 > operation. (And how that compares in size to the total size of your\r
  66 > collection of mail.)\r
  67 \r
  68 I guess you mean these directories:\r
  69 \r
  70 $ du -sh Maildir\r
  71 2,8G    Maildir\r
  72 $ cd Maildir\r
  73 $ du -sh .notmuch\r
  74 1,1G    .notmuch\r
  75 \r
  76 > That's definitely not too much mail. I think you should expect "notmuch\r
  77 > new" currently to index on the order of 10 - 100 messages/sec.\r
  78 >\r
  79 > Your "notmuch new" process should have been reporting a count once per\r
  80 > second as it progressed, (at least until things went wrong). How far did\r
  81 > you see that go?\r
  82 \r
  83 It started quickly, but its speed decreased, and I interrupted it at\r
  84 some 4000 messages, if I remember correctly.\r
  85 \r
  86 Regards\r
  87 Dominik\r