1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630624196F3
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id adZ0A+u7idWA for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from homiemail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF96431FC1
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
\r
21 Received: from sspaeth.de (unknown [195.190.188.219])
\r
22 by homiemail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 88C416A805F;
\r
23 Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 Received: by sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
\r
25 Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:44:16 +0200
\r
26 From: "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
27 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Notmuch list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
28 Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header
\r
29 In-Reply-To: <87bpdnl02k.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
30 References: <87iq821hba.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87hbnhprk0.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
31 <87y6gtnkch.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87bpdnl02k.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
32 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:44:16 +0200
\r
33 Message-ID: <87iq7ubhrj.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
34 User-Agent: notmuch version 0.1-107-g553feae (Emacs
\r
35 23.1.1/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
38 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
39 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
41 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
42 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
43 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
44 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
45 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
46 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
48 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
49 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
50 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:44:21 -0000
\r
52 On 2010-04-13, Carl Worth wrote:
\r
53 > > OK, final post from me on this issue.
\r
54 > No, wait! I want more from you. :-)
\r
56 Sigh, they always want more :-)
\r
58 > Would you care to put together a solution that does this from within
\r
59 > notmuch*.el ? I really want things usable by default without people
\r
60 > having to hack up their .emacs files.
\r
62 See the "sister mail" to this thread, in which I simply added the whole
\r
63 shebang to notmuch.el (not using a lambda function). Is that what you
\r
64 had in mind. Mind you, my elisp knowledge borders close to 0, so I would
\r
65 be surprised if I did not botch up things. However, I have tested the
\r
66 patch, and the User-Agent header got inserted.
\r
68 > Of course, we could also easily add a variable to make this not happen,
\r
69 > (but that can be added in a follow-on patch by anyone).
\r
71 Some don't want it, but it cannot be disabled in this patch, so that
\r
72 would indeed need to be a followup patch.
\r
74 This gets now inserted (message mode automatically wrapped the header
\r
76 User-Agent: notmuch version 0.1-107-g553feae (Emacs
\r
77 23.1.1/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
79 Is that an acceptable format? I would have preferred to not include the
\r
80 "version" string, but notmuch --version spits that out, and it was just
\r
81 easier to leave it in.
\r
83 Is that "version" really needed, BTW? Why can't notmuch --version not just say:
\r
84 notmuch 0.1-107-g553feae
\r