b3/cd9a15e19903c794404d40a7bfc18c9428c5a2

   1 Return-Path: <thomas@schwinge.name>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2846431FD0\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 Sep 2011 02:45:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: 0\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id E4ztu2FKXnBb for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Fri,  9 Sep 2011 02:45:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
  17 Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de\r
  18         [80.67.31.31])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A18F431FB6\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 Sep 2011 02:45:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
  21 Received: from [87.180.32.105] (helo=stokes.schwinge.homeip.net)\r
  22         by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.68)\r
  23         (envelope-from <thomas@schwinge.name>) id 1R1xeM-0002KQ-Km\r
  24         for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:45:30 +0200\r
  25 Received: (qmail 5665 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2011 09:45:14 -0000\r
  26 Received: from kepler.schwinge.homeip.net (192.168.111.7)\r
  27         by stokes.schwinge.homeip.net with QMQP; 9 Sep 2011 09:45:14 -0000\r
  28 Received: (nullmailer pid 11338 invoked by uid 1000);\r
  29         Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:45:14 -0000\r
  30 From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>\r
  31 To: Louis Rilling <l.rilling@av7.net>,\r
  32         Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  33 Subject: Re: [PATCH] notmuch restore --accumulate\r
  34 In-Reply-To: <20110909090633.GA3178@localdomain>\r
  35 References: <1315249637-20179-1-git-send-email-thomas@schwinge.name>\r
  36         <87liu2kcq6.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
  37         <20110909090633.GA3178@localdomain>\r
  38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.7-57-g64222ef (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
  39         (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  40 Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:45:13 +0200\r
  41 Message-ID: <87fwk63v86.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net>\r
  42 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  43 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  44         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  45 X-Df-Sender: dGhvbWFzQHNjaHdpbmdlLm5hbWU=\r
  46 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  49 Precedence: list\r
  50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  51         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  53         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  58         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  59 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:45:33 -0000\r
  60 \r
  61 --=-=-=\r
  62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
  63 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  64 \r
  65 Hi!\r
  66 \r
  67 On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:06:34 +0200, Louis Rilling <l.rilling@av7.net> wrote:\r
  68 > On 05/09/11 12:31 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:\r
  69 > > Also, we generally prefer to have modifications to the test suite in\r
  70 > > separate patches that precede the patches that add the features/fix the\r
  71 > > bugs.\r
  72 > >=20\r
  73 >=20\r
  74 > For new features, this does not look like 'git bisect'-safe.\r
  75 \r
  76 Exactly my thoughts.  I can perhaps see the usefulness (for first\r
  77 separately committing the testcase) for bugfixes, but why for new\r
  78 features?\r
  79 \r
  80 > I would say that\r
  81 > the testsuite patch should follow the new feature patch, don't you?\r
  82 \r
  83 I would keep them together; why separate them?\r
  84 \r
  85 \r
  86 Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe,\r
  87  Thomas\r
  88 \r
  89 --=-=-=\r
  90 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  91 \r
  92 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  93 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
  94 \r
  95 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOaeApAAoJEGe3hdm9kOiiIZEH/1+RxSFC2zD8p5SOK4vButUz\r
  96 8Va3AsKQKW6aGljVvfn/939Q3SucoKgeta7qUSP99LzxcTK96V8HttYBAxQWYwMJ\r
  97 nfIxjl59wEPY+3oZXnNLEaCd6L/xBbYx9yt349m5TiCYgOgboJ+iGIeZLbs6fQz8\r
  98 sYyD2o3GUPfTWbYwYE2RShk/4qTQLQ3pdtkknOwx6lmlP7tLjj/oSHGzy9veWsp5\r
  99 pl2usAyd3zuX3d40TZfWOJ1aPQZdKkUow/m9cXR/IHNjKFtsYIEEOJHRbsBlg+fj\r
 100 Gt8s+RSw/xbMUWUcY8bzSzzRwEnO6UaEDkMQPdu2EW8lgVJdFAwB9AA1FDeFOkY=\r
 101 =liJC\r
 102 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 103 --=-=-=--\r