1 Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6291D421189
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:44:23 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id l5eOAMFMZNyQ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:44:22 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DE48421181
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:44:22 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by bkty12 with SMTP id y12so604689bkt.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:44:21 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
26 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=wjFH6EeHYOaNAhn875vEz+fTzoRReA/25c8lYfTVns0=;
\r
29 b=plx0/JwoiNPYlzipDChd71Ev1QiP4vsoRJUMrPBpVms9tBZUHccQLz2N4EaPOAPqqe
\r
30 AVouHPIHV07yMlN1xrlVbCrFxwLtoGZzgQEIeJo1ASQ9uia5D7lLtZ2ZBEIdy/zxNyl9
\r
31 /86CjcvvoNVrfvaUDkcwjgjJomArq2re4bNvI=
\r
32 Received: by 10.204.225.71 with SMTP id ir7mr6951290bkb.124.1326811461355;
\r
33 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:44:21 -0800 (PST)
\r
34 Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])
\r
35 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ek9sm16880354bkb.10.2012.01.17.06.44.18
\r
36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
37 Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:44:19 -0800 (PST)
\r
38 From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
39 To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] test: Add `test_emacs_expect_t'.
\r
41 In-Reply-To: <cunobu2pfc4.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
42 References: <87pqei327k.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
43 <1326809224-22673-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
44 <1326809224-22673-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
45 <877h0qxv4u.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
46 <cunobu2pfc4.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
47 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+73~g8a5402e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
48 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
49 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:43:22 +0400
\r
50 Message-ID: <8739bexud1.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
57 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
65 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:44:23 -0000
\r
67 On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:35:07 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
68 > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:26:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
69 > > Sorry, I still do not understand why we can not implement
\r
70 > > test_emacs_expect_t() like:
\r
72 > > result=${test_emacs $@}
\r
73 > > test_expect_equal $result t
\r
75 > > Can you please explain?
\r
77 > In the failure case test_expect_equal does:
\r
79 > test_failure_ "$test_subtest_name" "$(diff -u $testname.expected $testname.output)"
\r
81 > that diff output is not useful here, because the test harness doesn't
\r
82 > have any expected output other than `t' with which to diff the actual
\r
85 > The emacs-address-cleaning test shows how we will provide expected
\r
86 > vs. actual output directly from within emacs, making it easier for the
\r
87 > developer to figure out what went wrong.
\r
89 Thanks for the explanation.
\r