b1/dc2c7dfcc9a4af7e29c072dbebbaaae4d3b809

   1 Return-Path: <awg@xvx.ca>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C292431FAF\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id 6kNsriF9Vysd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
  17 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com\r
  18         [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
  19         (No client certificate requested)\r
  20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9400B431FAE\r
  21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
  22 Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so60842lah.26\r
  23         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
  24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
  25         d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
  26         h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date\r
  27         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type\r
  28         :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;\r
  29         bh=aoXEABLs8/v5CbCZxTt4kBxbi/PsaBkxt/o7fSzVYJA=;\r
  30         b=QkeXA1DiLyafQoGcHzHBa6vif4vN/94vxCZnZazLxwzxEp+cjwxhC+IS41O5De5K84\r
  31         ZOwp4YFeYF0UWV0gDPHhhYlY4fbWzfzdEBhBc2yOUNWAv/Be5/Us3PJqQavJ55R8fKua\r
  32         B7KHAZTOBavzGTc29YYfpwxMrde2JOGJ5iovQZ4ii7cgsgiHOuVucTYgN/tm5vOhDPEL\r
  33         1+S+15vxy+wCpOkNnpzyxlNY/iT0NWGvSQ6aa/6wLszjGAbAs9SReQqEYy+V2CVGFyOJ\r
  34         1EvdZCTZHtJ9kIUjUbE/iO5dAJs0NjuhVqQO5/tRPw3AT/Y66Tiv6iC8B92BQ60rO64q\r
  35         5zEg==\r
  36 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  37 Received: by 10.112.28.10 with SMTP id x10mr1270589lbg.41.1335357979579; Wed,\r
  38         25 Apr 2012 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
  39 Sender: awg@xvx.ca\r
  40 Received: by 10.112.23.39 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
  41 X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56]\r
  42 In-Reply-To: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
  43 References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
  44 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:46:19 -0600\r
  45 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LgFcMzo0o4OikPi-J5dMzH9GfOo\r
  46 Message-ID:\r
  47  <CAMoJFUsi5xAX4e2eeSd_jC6-u-VD9o_t511Ce1eGHMqMaqe3xA@mail.gmail.com>\r
  48 Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13\r
  49 From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
  50 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
  51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
  52 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  53 X-Gm-Message-State:\r
  54  ALoCoQn62s06nGRmCsuooaA+gqld4YFGP/XKF0b9ecVuektDTeCDPYE7C0ZSAmnHid1UMugery9I\r
  55 Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  58 Precedence: list\r
  59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  60         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  67         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  68 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:46:24 -0000\r
  69 \r
  70 Hi David,\r
  71 \r
  72 On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:31, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
  73 > I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of\r
  74 > May. =A0What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and\r
  75 > pushed for 0.13?\r
  76 \r
  77 I would like to get the HTML reply series [1] in before 0.13, since\r
  78 otherwise the reply stuff that's already pushed can cause some ugly\r
  79 (but not buggy) behavior, quoting raw HTML in reply. There's been one\r
  80 review, and it's a small patch, but I think it could use another set\r
  81 of eyes.\r
  82 \r
  83 [1] id:"1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca"\r
  84 \r
  85 -- Adam\r