1 Return-Path: <darren@fernseed.info>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F4E40DDF7
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:04:02 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
\r
13 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA=2.157, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL=1.31,
\r
14 RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]
\r
16 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
17 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
18 with ESMTP id oqgkNd05EKFt for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
19 Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:03:51 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from silentio.fernseed.info (202.4.169.217.in-addr.arpa
\r
22 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
23 (No client certificate requested)
\r
24 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C895E40DDCB
\r
25 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:03:50 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 Received: from localhost (bookbinder.fernseed.info
\r
27 [IPv6:2001:8b0:ff94:1:224:2cff:fe37:838b])
\r
28 (Authenticated sender: darren)
\r
29 by silentio.fernseed.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95500404;
\r
30 Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:03:48 +0000 (GMT)
\r
31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fernseed.info;
\r
32 s=default; t=1289646228;
\r
33 bh=Rcf09sY7g80s07MS9qR2TKmQIT1PbPwOwr7Wd0hWq/U=;
\r
34 h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:
\r
35 MIME-Version:Content-Type;
\r
36 b=jaLp0N5YLKoVhAhtJzOOMfZW2PGz26tDbWsZLEVMtdsZDmtujku2IBq9q9rZVMkhC
\r
37 CEnkOVEdyEinW16YI+T2eZYlkTHvhfYRvpayq1mXfl1mYqsIhnVx7FeTyGiA84OonU
\r
38 bfRL3FEsCWsdCaJQHO91bLk2WpY15INPKRLKYF8M=
\r
39 From: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>
\r
40 To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr>,
\r
41 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
42 Subject: Re: [PATCH] How to improve the mail handling workflow?
\r
43 In-Reply-To: <87sjz5pxkp.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
44 References: <87fwv65zw1.fsf@free.fr> <87sjz6ft52.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>
\r
45 <87sjz5pxkp.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
46 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
\r
48 Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:03:47 +0000
\r
49 Message-ID: <87hbflwkmk.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>
\r
51 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
52 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
57 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
65 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:04:02 -0000
\r
68 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
70 On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:05:58 +0100, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrot=
\r
72 > I agree with you in that in many cases tags can be replaced by saved
\r
73 > searches. Last time I did it, i.e. used saved searches to distinguish
\r
74 > messages from different mailing lists, the result was that it took
\r
75 > very long time (something like 5 seconds) to show notmuch-hello
\r
77 Interesting, what Xapian backend are you using? I moved to chert after
\r
78 id:"87ocl1lut1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org" and my notmuch-hello with 15
\r
79 saved searches appears in a couple of seconds when freshly loaded,
\r
80 faster when switching back to it after use. That may well be slower
\r
81 than just tag searches but it's not yet at a threshold where I notice
\r
82 it. How many searches had you saved?
\r
84 > Additionally, I compared the speed of command line searches for tags
\r
85 > and for the whole email addresses and even without the bug mentioned
\r
86 > above, the search for to: is usually slower than the search for tag:.
\r
88 Very non-scientifically just using time and vm/drop_caches on my
\r
89 netbook, having tagged all mail sent to the list address with 'notmuch',
\r
90 I seem to get much the same performance:
\r
92 $ time notmuch search tag:notmuch > /dev/null
\r
95 user 0m4.740s=20=20=20=20
\r
98 $ time notmuch search to:notmuch > /dev/null
\r
104 $ time notmuch search to:notmuch@notmuchmail.org > /dev/null
\r
111 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
113 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
114 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
116 iEYEARECAAYFAkzecJMACgkQP1ao/7snsT52TQCeIHOlOF4p8Xe4m20z4Ob8s0Qn
\r
117 qt0AoJuGcorz+/xUmXfWP00Hn9AECp4A
\r
119 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r