1 Return-Path: <BATV+7d079ec6ed591f168fc6+2419+infradead.org+hohndel@bombadil.srs.infradead.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8894196F0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 3bfpTQhKFOc7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E893431FC1
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
\r
21 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
\r
22 id 1NztPU-00022v-6T; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:12:48 +0000
\r
23 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500)
\r
24 id 97C20C00E4; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 From: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>
\r
26 To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>, Notmuch list
\r
27 <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
28 Subject: Re: RFC: User-Agent header
\r
29 In-Reply-To: <87iq821hba.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
30 References: <87iq821hba.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
31 Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:12:47 -0700
\r
32 Message-ID: <m3r5mqgeq8.fsf@x200.gr8dns.org>
\r
34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
35 X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hohndel@infradead.org> by
\r
36 bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
\r
37 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
38 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
40 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
41 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
42 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
43 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
44 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
45 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
46 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
47 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
48 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
49 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:12:49 -0000
\r
51 On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:26:01 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote:
\r
52 > notmuch is (mostly) not responsible for sending email. However, people
\r
53 > using the emacs frontend use notmuch to create the reply.
\r
55 > Am I the only one who is sometimes curious as to what mail agents others
\r
56 > use? Would it be useful to insert a header to notmuch reply analog to:
\r
58 > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
\r
60 > We could reuse the same version string that we use for the release (or
\r
61 > the git string that was used to build notmuch). I can use this to create
\r
64 > No patch yet, just asking if this is a good idea or not.
\r
66 I think it's a very good idea. But it should be something that includes
\r
67 the other components of how you send email...
\r
71 User-Aget: Emacs 23 Message-mode / notmuch-0.1.1
\r
77 Intel Open Source Technology Center
\r