1 Return-Path: <brandon@invergo.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927C0431FC0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:20:57 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id h+tBQ0--ddxb for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:20:57 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbhh.dreamhost.com
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40EA431FBF
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:20:56 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBF91DE059;
\r
24 Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:20:56 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=invergo.net; h=from:to
\r
26 :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
27 content-type; s=invergo.net; bh=543q9+MxK1ZUXM86zBf4sME8Rpo=; b=
\r
28 LOs2E87C1TWMSHSORYKHZXxwFFYx8ALSNwIKMDPdmpEdR/R3CQ7o60hn7L/EKGSR
\r
29 y2TETKQ36y4ZhQFWlIDQ6VJ2/ga9hmbPlFvyCVdUSFlz8xJPyUqDDxfrrPMZmDdg
\r
30 B+Z9yq2XaiPxj0Q7CcGDmUfUZu1pbbzCvBqQTcxsxW0=
\r
31 Received: from localhost (unknown [95.61.26.193])
\r
32 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
33 (No client certificate requested)
\r
34 (Authenticated sender: brandon@invergo.net)
\r
35 by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 680501DE00C;
\r
36 Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:20:55 -0800 (PST)
\r
37 From: Brandon Invergo <brandon@invergo.net>
\r
38 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
39 Subject: Re: handling mail sent to a subscribed list
\r
40 In-Reply-To: <87ehis5unf.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>
\r
41 References: <87txruqg8y.fsf@invergo.net> <87ehis5unf.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>
\r
42 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1
\r
43 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
44 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:20:54 +0100
\r
45 Message-ID: <87liczlipl.fsf@invergo.net>
\r
47 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
48 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:55:39 -0800
\r
49 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
50 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
52 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
53 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
56 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
57 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
59 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
61 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:20:57 -0000
\r
63 > If understand correctly, your concern is with the second copy of a
\r
64 > message with the same message-id not showing up in your inbox? If so, this is
\r
65 > more or less a feature (although in the case where the duplicated
\r
66 > message id's are because of malice or stupidity on the sender's part,
\r
67 > and not duplicated messages, it is also a known bug).
\r
69 > On the command line you can try "notmuch search --output=files id:foo"
\r
70 > where id:foo is copied via "c i" in the emacs interface.
\r
72 > Or maybe I misunderstand your problem completely.
\r
74 Thanks for the reply. Yes I think you summed it up; I figured that it
\r
75 was behaving properly. In short it's that I have the email that I sent
\r
76 sitting wherever it was Fcc'ed and then shortly thereafter I receive
\r
77 from the email list a message with the same ID. Since the Fcc'ed one was
\r
78 already added to the database, the one that I received from the list
\r
79 just sits there. But I guess others using mailing lists have encountered
\r
80 this too, so I was asking how they handle it since I haven't figured it
\r
83 I'll give that command a try to see if I can put it to good use somehow.
\r