1 Return-Path: <daniel@schoepe.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801ED431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id cEu1c5Bydv5b for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.161.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6F99429E25
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by faai28 with SMTP id i28so5098910faa.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=schoepe.org; s=google;
\r
26 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
\r
27 :message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=jtdSYasflf1QMgZI+ikwpVeajJMrqtcGi7TRI/a4y6E=;
\r
29 b=gut41iqxeoVzmmVas9H89wtK/89AmP80BxF8wC2uUoE7q6DJuLcooKATLARPVO9gWt
\r
30 YqXWfNJ6wqwJLTIHLZfMHBxU7s7Sc1VCQmydoXvH4LeIT4Xvm4JPkyRgQv0E0nh1Ssh0
\r
31 umGZIVpIbWx+FbPFUvHalntfzZfA2kFFwuK5k=
\r
32 Received: by 10.223.76.135 with SMTP id c7mr16100230fak.14.1319919352245;
\r
33 Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
\r
34 Received: from localhost (dslb-178-004-066-018.pools.arcor-ip.net.
\r
36 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n25sm26383726fah.15.2011.10.29.13.15.50
\r
37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
38 Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 From: Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org>
\r
40 To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
41 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] cli: add support for limiting the number of
\r
43 In-Reply-To: <878vo3r26z.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
44 References: <cover.1319833617.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
45 <f16c7983a8a639ea2ed1178a3190afb9620153e2.1319833617.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
46 <87mxcjk8mt.fsf@gilead.invalid> <878vo3r26z.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
47 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+57~gead43c9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
48 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
49 Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:15:43 +0200
\r
50 Message-ID: <87hb2rk100.fsf@gilead.invalid>
\r
52 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
53 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
54 Cc: amdragon@mit.edu
\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
59 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:15:55 -0000
\r
71 On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:08:04 +0300, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
72 > strtoul() won't touch the data pointed to by p (it only modifies p), so
\r
73 > in that sense it could be const, but you're right in that it really
\r
74 > should be 'char *', just for a more complicated reason. Thanks for
\r
75 > making me look it up: http://c-faq.com/ansi/constmismatch.html (not the
\r
76 > best of explanations, perhaps, but gives an idea why the 2nd parameter
\r
77 > of strtoul() can't be 'const char **').
\r
79 Oh, right, thanks for the clarification. As I often do in situations
\r
80 such as this, I confused "const char *" and "char const *".
\r
83 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
85 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
86 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
88 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOrF7vAAoJEIaTAtce+Z+JJG4P/2FKOZJlcF0cLbwkk7yXiIFi
\r
89 gLnnmItAuZa+UEWQ0LeY1XTHRqEy39l4CsZSbA4EB0l0mOrjiM3XxW8ezX+rTgs4
\r
90 7i9AuJxoFVlQOTJPuAT+t3CyQhspL9LBrJ69yAoP4R4L51FOa4IqBcwhBpT0rNYC
\r
91 MwBBuPwL/BL+ZnQCnGplf6SyjCdTPLSYHaVLYtvQDCKNqRFX4LUI+hASxC1IILJq
\r
92 v9knKmuk1qnjfp8EsVh5j905+8K2o1OnVcpW64gxfNVPbrVxU2xuv3eUQsto49iA
\r
93 fDXsWH0uZckqwtYg1swVOZbGL8Yo5khfJoGnQ1Wfnt+3X0Igq+jnrC27nqA3Iqec
\r
94 MPBi9Y79aGWZ8684yAXLV6JoYp/dIsvWtto/GhQaSJh5TuznHgLfm9xsSCvkTkUS
\r
95 2ZHuAHfPWpamz8Lt/D56JFf8cJCMejN1bjOsDT//8ceduWShgnw8Bn3Y+rZHdzFD
\r
96 9Aab3Fl8iMbUj82xPTyXpCSjgWJd8Vg++z+inRKoz9lW+fxmZvseFvUu1obeTXp1
\r
97 54dp/xEdnyKDX3XD3C5FYvPq5J6Lu/oPf2bsF94nnssjDfTBrjYVi4nvHZowfyWs
\r
98 LSQkJkISUqVFVQr98+idTlxeWODFfanZe7KUUKUcDa25jTge0kjTjsr0hozkItWq
\r
99 a4sqdfyGcjBMxWoaJlil
\r
101 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r