9f/fdaa7cddf916936d7d33f3df82f1c57b000bcd

   1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B727431FB6\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:53 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id 3p88P0l9ptS7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:52 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
  18         [131.215.239.19])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E2C431FAE\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:52 -0800 (PST)\r
  21 Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
  22         by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3509F2E50E98;\r
  23         Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:52 -0800 (PST)\r
  24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
  25 Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com\r
  26         [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
  27         by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4884B2E50E91;\r
  28         Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:49 -0800 (PST)\r
  29 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
  30         id AA3EF557; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:48 -0800 (PST)\r
  31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  32 To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  33 Subject: Re: gmime2.6 packaging for debian\r
  34 In-Reply-To: <877h0e29ci.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net>\r
  35 References: <877h0e29ci.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net>\r
  36 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+131~g7337d96 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
  37         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  38 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:16:45 -0800\r
  39 Message-ID: <87fwf1sjhe.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  40 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  41 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  42         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  43 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  44 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  45 Precedence: list\r
  46 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  47         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  48 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  49         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  50 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  51 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  52 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  53 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  54         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  55 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:16:53 -0000\r
  56 \r
  57 --=-=-=\r
  58 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  59 \r
  60 On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:47:57 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.=\r
  61 net> wrote:\r
  62 > those of you who run debian might be interested in the gmime2.6\r
  63 > packaging which i cobbled together for debian from the existing gmime2.4\r
  64 > packaging:\r
  65 >=20\r
  66 >  http://bugs.debian.org/657426\r
  67 >=20\r
  68 > Those of you developing notmuch with the gmime 2.6 patchsets might be\r
  69 > interested in trying it out.  Please let me know of any problems you\r
  70 > might have with the experimental packaging.\r
  71 >=20\r
  72 > It would be good if we could change the build-deps to\r
  73 >=20\r
  74 >  libgmime2.6-dev | libgmime2.4-dev\r
  75 \r
  76 Hey, folks.  FYI, I build a gmime2.6 debian package from Daniel's new\r
  77 packaging [0], and it built and installed completely cleanly.  After\r
  78 reconfiguring notmuch, it picked up the 2.6 library and compiled and\r
  79 works without issue.\r
  80 \r
  81 Thanks so much dkg and everyone who got the compatibility working!\r
  82 Sounds like official packages might be showing up in experimental soon.\r
  83 \r
  84 jamie.\r
  85 \r
  86 [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D657426#15\r
  87 \r
  88 --=-=-=\r
  89 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  90 \r
  91 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  92 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
  93 \r
  94 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPIk9eAAoJEO00zqvie6q8MagQAKvMIsKY3pIgGgjYaKXA2tgU\r
  95 qXLQDH7L46+A/BPFyQpPLrjZRr156UsBrypg6+8eb8g/f/YahxtzQ9fpOeL8ESO/\r
  96 0TWeeUG21526gvvwAF23hpokfXwk+RkbhOZlE7DH9X81UnUgSlxGMhrNffCaQETm\r
  97 2RT4sNjMj981/3hI14J3frkNYv+CTo5/C5m3X4pH+qMTiLTEz09S7tPsHCivuVRz\r
  98 j4V8yrhNdB4Wc3cRWSNcTlXQMitL1k2n5wGr/BogW7PK9sTsK9bB1L1lVec5PqU9\r
  99 d3DPSpvxDOyfefaPVE4pfl6hI2OAVgrmLtKII/AfZzJ90uEIHdlCo/4xZcMH/jDc\r
 100 pyVqDpQ80LT6A1RK6oRv6dhXphV+fGoEYGnb5qbUQd/JYhQZNkzqivc5juz+Y8Cb\r
 101 TMHJj9GIiLfvJvO09Pl8ZcnZaMq7lTnQA1J0zmSdOckWBWmv2z1zQhVFiRHbF7nM\r
 102 vzermgGeXdQSERySG538oMCjWPgQMH51jcbMQcK1ctdwQ3vowT+lIOwT6tle8XEB\r
 103 tQEv1YCVDu6pvHvphk9Cn/ZFFTFryMff+dKWwU4n+KK+dKYDT56s+IN8Qur2JMVO\r
 104 k3gMBuilSMglGKk4V+s7fMrzg076f+X8lUl2cGGTJBfQCdm/vwRzY60+4j2IXSTt\r
 105 7hESG/GCukFZ5XGAgI0j\r
 106 =8ZJI\r
 107 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 108 --=-=-=--\r