1 Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A988E431FBF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id nLRUXhT8C8EM for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net
\r
18 [87.98.215.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BF65431FBD
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim
\r
23 4.72) (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
\r
24 id 1Wcioa-0007Fv-NO; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:05:20 +0000
\r
25 Received: (nullmailer pid 19601 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 22 Apr 2014
\r
27 From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
28 To: Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
\r
29 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add configurable changed tag to messages that have been
\r
31 In-Reply-To: <1397163239-sup-5101@qwerzila>
\r
32 References: <1396800683-9164-1-git-send-email-eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
\r
33 <87wqf2gqig.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <1397140962-sup-6514@qwerzila>
\r
34 <87wqexnqvb.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <1397163239-sup-5101@qwerzila>
\r
35 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18~rc0 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
36 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
37 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 07:05:02 +0900
\r
38 Message-ID: <87d2g9ja0h.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
40 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
41 Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
42 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
45 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
46 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
48 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
49 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
50 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
52 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
54 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:07:17 -0000
\r
56 Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com> writes:
\r
59 > I am talking about syncing tags to a maildir _folder_, not flags. It
\r
60 > could be implemented as maildir.synchronize is now, but it would be a
\r
61 > larger feature which could work in a lot of different ways.
\r
64 So to try and clarify the use case, this could be used to add a tag
\r
65 "changed" to each message-id that had one or more files
\r
66 moved/added/deleted on disk. You would then retag that message using
\r
67 something like the output of notmuch search --output=files so that a set
\r
68 of tags corresponds to a set of folders containing the message. Is this
\r
69 correct? I guess the proposed ctime information could be used for this
\r
70 as well, if it also tracked those non-tag related changes. I guess this
\r
71 would make it worse for David M's purposes (although presumeably still
\r
72 better than nothing).
\r