RE: Reply all - issue
[notmuch-archives.git] / 9e / 571395653d94255afeedb14bf025e1fbad9c2c
1 Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A4D431FB6\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  4 May 2011 14:56:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id cdpi+W03WHFi for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Wed,  4 May 2011 14:56:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com\r
19         [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
20         (No client certificate requested)\r
21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 432A9431FB5\r
22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  4 May 2011 14:56:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
23 Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so487360ewy.26\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 04 May 2011 14:56:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
26         h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer\r
27         :in-reply-to:references;\r
28         bh=tP2Ga6m7QXPNL4j4x3Q+3I4Sd+qOI09eVRX945Of9ck=;\r
29         b=LRsD3Qiq/TuIyvdJNrOAF1FmmyLIvfY5Qq80F1i7lpiMhYUA4FM4653KldOSOeCscP\r
30         SZH53FAopJGZKxCBm6HUHlYlHzsgNjL4dDlBaftNWqjAU3CW0+nmu4scs4jNLEw2G0LD\r
31         64Csaa5MiUwb8TE5Hp5j7OuV61e7amU1u80UI=\r
32 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
33         h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to:references;\r
34         b=RmXylmDnvA+oLjuiwcF6zj3oK/M6i+lc7jln7YJNaaNW0vO5nV545Jt3zG6RBgbYS5\r
35         9hVULa4SSeUe3ixcNBzIIuvdCr+56pQ0xYjdH0J3gjA2fl75nTEhsd0RMXQVJ65n4lCk\r
36         3dp4pseXQg0gqy3xnChh+Y8yVJzyoxAfmQvlM=\r
37 Received: by 10.14.22.70 with SMTP id s46mr824470ees.145.1304546164173;\r
38         Wed, 04 May 2011 14:56:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
39 Received: from localhost (a91-153-253-80.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.153.253.80])\r
40         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y7sm4303eeh.19.2011.05.04.14.56.03\r
41         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
42         Wed, 04 May 2011 14:56:03 -0700 (PDT)\r
43 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
44 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
45 Subject: [PATCH v3] test/search: add check for slightly tricky search\r
46 Date: Thu,  5 May 2011 00:55:58 +0300\r
47 Message-Id: <1304546158-15998-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
48 X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5\r
49 In-Reply-To: <20110504212636.GP29861@mit.edu>\r
50 References: <20110504212636.GP29861@mit.edu>\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
53 Precedence: list\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
55         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
57         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 21:56:07 -0000\r
64 \r
65 It's not really tricky, there are many addresses with a '-' in them. I\r
66 personally really want to differentiate between foo@bar.com,\r
67 foo-testing@bar.com, and foo-patches@bar.com.\r
68 \r
69 This fails, but it shouldn't:\r
70 \r
71  FAIL   Search by from (tricky):\r
72         --- search.17.expected  2011-05-04 21:52:52.913218077 +0000\r
73         +++ search.17.output    2011-05-04 21:52:52.913218077 +0000\r
74         @@ -1 +1,3 @@\r
75         +thread:XXX   2000-01-01 [1/1] Search By From Name; search by from (name) (inbox unread)\r
76         +thread:XXX   2000-01-01 [1/1] search-by-from-trick@foo.com; search by from (tricky trick) (inbox unread)\r
77          thread:XXX   2000-01-01 [1/1] search-by-from@foo.com; search by from (tricky) (inbox unread)\r
78 \r
79 One possibility to make this work is to translate @ to -at- in the\r
80 database, so search-by-from@foo.com becomes search-by-from-trick-at-foo.com,\r
81 therefore searching for search-by-from-at- would not be confused.\r
82 \r
83 Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
84 ---\r
85  test/search |    6 ++++++\r
86  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)\r
87 \r
88 diff --git a/test/search b/test/search\r
89 index b180c7f..c6223f4 100755\r
90 --- a/test/search\r
91 +++ b/test/search\r
92 @@ -123,4 +123,10 @@ echo -n > expected &&\r
93  notmuch search "no-message-matches-this" > actual &&\r
94  test_cmp expected actual'\r
95  \r
96 +test_begin_subtest "Search by from (tricky):"\r
97 +add_message '[subject]="search by from (tricky trick)"' '[date]="Sat, 01 Jan 2000 12:00:00 -0000"' '[from]=search-by-from-trick@foo.com'\r
98 +add_message '[subject]="search by from (tricky)"' '[date]="Sat, 01 Jan 2000 12:00:00 -0000"' '[from]=search-by-from@foo.com'\r
99 +output=$(notmuch search from:"search-by-from@" | notmuch_search_sanitize)\r
100 +test_expect_equal "$output" "thread:XXX   2000-01-01 [1/1] search-by-from@foo.com; search by from (tricky) (inbox unread)"\r
101 +\r
102  test_done\r
103 -- \r
104 1.7.5\r
105 \r