1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E03F431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:35:48 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 5LO1OHsnBZG7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:35:48 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-la0-f53.google.com (mail-la0-f53.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1B38431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:35:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id l5so4034376lah.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 13:35:46 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=google.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
\r
28 bh=ruDzUlpsIe/SN1TEQXBBemHcSTjIhe+ndmmvzPFNzTI=;
\r
29 b=P95/g1MyAuAE5HpqBARE37BbNFhyc5jDticiaUF7b6+p0Pa7ypbNDNuH4Cq0pI8W6J
\r
30 jJpiQm/TzOkS0NBF3YZjKtGXDZWwO7kfxo0KlASC9DPdZ375giIIFGag3V5/c32+Ua95
\r
31 5YfgJJLAbKtPbMzWeIQcmAunvoNXbtdKVH7Miaey0c3PqK4G/S2zKmvdaYa/EBB44kwE
\r
32 YYZD2R/Pd6uFAd5Ltvkf9Y1GSUyL9ly2UPmZuS0xE8badDMwi4gwOkTnF28dJ0CrhVOM
\r
33 tVvfaZ5pC98nyjJiTekyoCrIJ/HGlER+QcvSjubgau9P46cXpZx1jSaF2NQRfg3Z5rgE
\r
35 Received: by 10.152.47.97 with SMTP id c1mr7279156lan.37.1352064946149;
\r
36 Sun, 04 Nov 2012 13:35:46 -0800 (PST)
\r
37 Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe51df00-27.dhcp.inet.fi.
\r
39 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i7sm5095275lbg.13.2012.11.04.13.35.44
\r
40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Nov 2012 13:35:45 -0800 (PST)
\r
41 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
42 To: Blake Jones <blakej@foo.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Solaris support
\r
44 In-Reply-To: <1351998962-25135-1-git-send-email-blakej@foo.net>
\r
45 References: <1351998962-25135-1-git-send-email-blakej@foo.net>
\r
46 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+81~g1924356 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1
\r
48 Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 23:35:43 +0200
\r
49 Message-ID: <87a9uxf3v4.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
53 ALoCoQlLhal5AfGKtHmPRWe6MDPDmCRqdg4zNxRS8JW0Y1QTvbMDpsGVwPkab+qzSpMALmospmb7
\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
58 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
66 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 21:35:48 -0000
\r
68 On Sun, 04 Nov 2012, Blake Jones <blakej@foo.net> wrote:
\r
71 > This patch series fixes several issues which are needed to allow notmuch
\r
72 > to build on Solaris 11. I've been "testing" it for a month or so by
\r
73 > using Karel Zak's fork of mutt along with a copy of notmuch-0.13.2 that
\r
74 > I got to compile. After a friend asked for a copy of my setup, I
\r
75 > decided to try to get my patches cleaned up enough to submit, so that he
\r
76 > wouldn't need to deal with them if he wanted to hack on it.
\r
78 Thanks for doing this. I had a *very* brief look at the patches, and
\r
79 commented on what I thought stood out. Otherwise I didn't spot anything
\r
80 out of the ordinary, but I'd like it if someone else had a glance too.
\r