1 Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A00431FC2
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id co+iSiB3PyyG for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F5AC431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)
\r
23 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
\r
24 id 1X7hzm-0002Gn-Jt; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 06:28:58 -0300
\r
25 Received: (nullmailer pid 21082 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 17 Jul 2014
\r
27 From: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
\r
28 To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
\r
29 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] nmbug: Handle missing @upstream in is_unmerged
\r
30 In-Reply-To: <20140716230347.GQ30232@odin>
\r
31 References: <cover.1404678709.git.wking@tremily.us>
\r
32 <f96d39a63a505216141bd2daaf3a52e066713296.1404678709.git.wking@tremily.us>
\r
33 <87bnsp7wyt.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20140716230347.GQ30232@odin>
\r
34 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+45~gf47eeac (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
35 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
36 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 06:28:55 -0300
\r
37 Message-ID: <87mwc872qw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
39 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
40 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
41 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
42 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
44 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
45 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
46 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
47 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
48 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
49 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
51 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
52 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
53 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 09:29:07 -0000
\r
55 "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> writes:
\r
57 > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:36:10PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
\r
58 >> W. Trevor King writes:
\r
59 >> > If we don't have an upstream, there is nothing to merge, so
\r
60 >> > nothing is unmerged. This avoids errors like:
\r
62 >> pushed this one patch.
\r
64 > Without the stderr-catching of something like patch 3, this means
\r
65 > folks without an upstream are going to see a distracting:
\r
67 > error: No upstream configured for branch 'master'
\r
69 > if they run 'nmbug status' without an @upstream.
\r
71 > I'm working through the Python translation now ;).
\r
73 Perhaps the best thing is to revert that patch then?
\r