1 Return-Path: <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF7040A637
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 11:26:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id cKbYfXXhNR3D for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 7 Jan 2012 11:26:11 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610D240A635
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 11:26:11 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
\r
21 (envelope-from <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>) id 1Rjbu3-00074V-2J
\r
22 for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 20:26:07 +0100
\r
23 Received: from c-71-237-233-41.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([71.237.233.41])
\r
24 by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
\r
26 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 20:26:07 +0100
\r
27 Received: from mailinglists by c-71-237-233-41.hsd1.or.comcast.net with local
\r
28 (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
\r
29 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 20:26:07 +0100
\r
30 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
\r
31 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
32 From: Mueen Nawaz <mailinglists@nawaz.org>
\r
33 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] notmuch reply bugfix & reply to sender only
\r
34 Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 11:25:49 -0800
\r
36 Message-ID: <87wr93qpqa.fsf@fester.com>
\r
37 References: <cover.1325794371.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
38 <87zke13n4p.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
41 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
\r
42 X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-71-237-233-41.hsd1.or.comcast.net
\r
44 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Dgff35n+f0LvWMWC9SldtnuUzqc=
\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
49 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
57 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 19:26:12 -0000
\r
59 Jameson Graef Rollins
\r
60 <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:
\r
62 > On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:25:11 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
63 >> Bikeshedding topic #1: How about making replying to just the sender the default
\r
64 >> in "notmuch reply", and having --reply-all option (instead of --no-reply-all)?
\r
66 >> Bikeshedding topic #2: How about binding 'r' to reply to just the sender by
\r
67 >> default, and making 'R' reply-all (instead of vice versa)?
\r
69 > I personally like both of these suggestions, and would not be bothered
\r
70 > by the changed default, so I support both of these changes.
\r
72 I too feel that 'r' should reply only to sender, and 'R' should reply
\r
73 all. Having reply-all as default is a pain.
\r