1 Return-Path: <servilio@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FD5431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:29:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 1cUdfA1nywLy for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:29:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-ew0-f220.google.com (mail-ew0-f220.google.com
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F25B431FAE
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:29:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
21 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so2676217ewy.0
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:29:11 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
24 h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
\r
25 :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
\r
26 :content-transfer-encoding;
\r
27 bh=i46JkosEWheOrwJOO5mF/LgEf3IivQgCmrlocegGWwU=;
\r
28 b=Z+OWzcGFG/2kdKX8YhD+lYfY5Iaoi9LHbWGD6EdQtgh0I9t0OUhIJAHNZ8Pf38xyUG
\r
29 DyLN3NyciK14tNgOk6ocfn4KO1PpUPHPgUVCVcygEx2PtKxx2HC9F/oFygWXHQERkFql
\r
30 URauuTEXiSa7DkEd3M9ExSqpsF17twxgglhHs=
\r
31 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
32 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
\r
33 :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
\r
34 b=vBtGFjJX175lULJ7bJx93o5JYoDkmIoYW7okHWLTgDd4aIVT5Q/4MpnqAp3/q4kfIi
\r
35 HO2Jvej+6O99W5N446xG6Mk3SR4jFScIc61vphKgtuvbr3wS1/9yIKTXetMf563U2Nki
\r
36 XNgddygtnuAHgn3iKZscI+X17MwJf3Xnsufx4=
\r
38 Received: by 10.216.87.80 with SMTP id x58mr1155508wee.92.1263918551081; Tue,
\r
39 19 Jan 2010 08:29:11 -0800 (PST)
\r
40 In-Reply-To: <20100119160449.GA28198@finestructure.net>
\r
41 References: <87pr57jvkz.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
42 <201001181641.25647.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <87hbqjwgmf.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
43 <87my0a5i80.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87my0aqgw9.fsf@veldthuis.com>
\r
44 <20100119152427.GL8342@finestructure.net> <877hrexfat.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
45 <20100119160449.GA28198@finestructure.net>
\r
46 Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:29:10 -0500
\r
47 Message-ID: <b22065d01001190829pfe405dfna2fa6409da9684d7@mail.gmail.com>
\r
48 From: Servilio Afre Puentes <servilio@gmail.com>
\r
49 To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
\r
51 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
52 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:43:20 -0800
\r
53 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 Subject: Re: [notmuch] Introducing notmuchsync
\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
59 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:29:13 -0000
\r
69 2010/1/19 Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>:
\r
71 > That said, I have vasilated just a bit on this, as to whether notmuch
\r
72 > should touch the mail at all, or just process it. =A0But having thought
\r
73 > about it a bit, I think that notmuch really *is* an MUA, or at least
\r
74 > the mail processing part of a MUA (MUA minus message reader), and
\r
75 > should therefore do the appropriate things with the maildir.
\r
77 I on the other hand think that it is just the indexer, and that the
\r
78 right way to integrate it into a MUA is by making this MUA call
\r
79 notmuch to update the DB/index with the actions just performed on a
\r
80 message/group of messages (moving, deleting, tagging, etc.).
\r
82 For what I've read so far from messages of the authors in this mailing
\r
83 list and the programmed behaviour, I think that is the intention
\r
84 (though not fully implemented yet) and in my opinion the right one.
\r
85 Maybe if the notmuch.el code would have been written as a set of hooks
\r
86 into Gnus for customizing views this would have been more evident
\r
87 (though I haven't neither used or looked at the vim front-end code),
\r
88 or maybe I am missing the point entirely and the long-term goal of the
\r
89 authors is to have a full-fledged MUA.
\r