1 Return-Path: <kha@treskal.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28360431FBF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:19:21 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
9 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
10 with ESMTP id jxIFZSG2Efo4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
11 Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:19:20 -0800 (PST)
\r
12 Received: from mail1.space2u.com (mail1.space2u.com [62.20.1.135])
\r
13 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A77431FBC
\r
14 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:19:20 -0800 (PST)
\r
15 Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com
\r
16 [209.85.218.224]) (authenticated bits=0)
\r
17 by mail1.space2u.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nANDJ7cw028661
\r
18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT)
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:19:07 +0100
\r
20 Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so3889339bwz.30
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:19:18 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by 10.204.11.17 with SMTP id r17mr4869095bkr.41.1258982358062; Mon,
\r
24 23 Nov 2009 05:19:18 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 In-Reply-To: <1873022c0911230311o77e55fdqa5464a2dd16ec265@mail.gmail.com>
\r
26 References: <87skc5yd6v.wl%djcb@djcbsoftware.nl>
\r
27 <b8197bcb0911222334v26e96890t3632369ff32ff80f@mail.gmail.com>
\r
28 <1873022c0911230311o77e55fdqa5464a2dd16ec265@mail.gmail.com>
\r
29 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:19:18 +0100
\r
30 Message-ID: <b8197bcb0911230519l4edf1b72w26d993834f25a417@mail.gmail.com>
\r
31 From: Karl Wiberg <kha@treskal.com>
\r
32 To: Dirk-Jan Binnema <djcb.bulk@gmail.com>
\r
33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
34 Cc: "notmuch@notmuchmail org" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>, djcb@djcbsoftware.nl
\r
35 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] * avoid gcc 4.4.1 compiler warnings due
\r
36 to ignored write return values
\r
37 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
38 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
\r
40 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
41 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
42 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
43 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
44 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
45 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
46 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
47 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
48 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
49 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:19:21 -0000
\r
51 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dirk-Jan Binnema <djcb.bulk@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
53 > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Karl Wiberg <kha@treskal.com> wrote:
\r
55 > > Didn't the "(void)" suggestion work?
\r
57 > I actually preferred that solution, but unfortunately, it didn't
\r
58 > stop gcc from complaining...
\r
60 Hmpf. I'd argue that that's a gcc bug, forcing the user to use an
\r
61 unnecessarily complicated way to pretend to use the return value. Oh
\r
65 Karl Wiberg, kha@treskal.com
\r
66 subrabbit.wordpress.com
\r
67 www.treskal.com/kalle
\r