RE: [Spam-verdenking][english 100%] RE: Reply all - issue
[notmuch-archives.git] / 97 / 73a2c4e5592a80310e0305b60cddc8600d96a9
1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99449431FB6\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:42 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.099\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id JW8CCNToFGZN for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com\r
19         [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))\r
20         (No client certificate requested)\r
21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00006431FAE\r
22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
23 Received: by dadg9 with SMTP id g9so7012926dad.26\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
26         h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version\r
27         :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;\r
28         bh=257Ygue83o/MyU52CkgsYPFT8/KLI/Sz1JgArcX+e1s=;\r
29         b=vxONlc53L/at9DCYWpmEs/2+7whtlmRySo2BJPNntxR3EoDFLuMX7SHHE+8TwYHf1V\r
30         GGtEcrqA7tCuJjqxZlqsv3hGt38Y1lx7ft2P+THdNAwU48PcdNkuh+EXwIj/YHDc2I2t\r
31         3a91oQ2r/1yOaZwv5OfE7TRfffJAW4fUdWUvub42hXoAwILP43Jmy5QZ2/CDM2fMV3DJ\r
32         UnqWII6E9nrxa2A0eL+kxuBhDFHwodsylFhca2TQl7ioemhJcKhjbsJyB/qpOGITiJ8R\r
33         8LXtx+TTjTWpKE52UEvLb6RWGqOOzYH1lhGCLmqrwcY9orqGNzxs6vdK9IdUvVUDjJW2\r
34         mDig==\r
35 Received: by 10.68.232.161 with SMTP id tp1mr38194816pbc.44.1339916612975;\r
36         Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
37 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
38         [220.233.42.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id\r
39         gh10sm19381850pbc.19.2012.06.17.00.03.28\r
40         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
41         Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:03:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
42 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:03:25 +1000\r
43 Message-ID: <20120617170325.GA18059@hili.localdomain>\r
44 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
45 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
46 Subject: Re: search summary and exclusions\r
47 In-Reply-To: <878vgam7lg.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
48 References: <20120529000012.GF2331@hili.localdomain>\r
49         <87mx4sp79z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
50         <20120529140107.GE2347@hili.localdomain>\r
51         <87fwajnibz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
52         <20120530130733.GC2332@hili.localdomain>\r
53         <878vgam7lg.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
54 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
56 Content-Disposition: inline\r
57 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
60 Precedence: list\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
62         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
64         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
69         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 07:03:42 -0000\r
71 \r
72 On Wed, 30 May 2012 08:49:31 +0100, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
73\r
74 > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:\r
75 > >\r
76 > > Maybe there is room for another keyword under --exclude?\r
77\r
78 > Yes that might be the best way to go. Something like --exclude=all and\r
79 > then excluded messages never appear anywhere?\r
80\r
81 > I think it should be easy: I will try to send a patch tonight.\r
82 \r
83 Hi Mark,\r
84 \r
85 Did you get a chance to try this?  Otherwise I can have a look.\r
86 \r
87 Peter\r