1 Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2356DE17FB
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.115 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.115]
\r
13 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id IL0PHAE6EhFE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224])
\r
18 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C526DE175C
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80)
\r
21 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
\r
22 id 1ZWw3O-0000Yr-2N; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:37:30 +0000
\r
23 Received: (nullmailer pid 11856 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 02 Sep 2015
\r
25 From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
26 To: Amadeusz =?utf-8?B?xbtvxYJub3dza2k=?= <aidecoe@aidecoe.name>, David
\r
27 Mazieres expires 2015-11-29 PST
\r
28 <mazieres-sggp47c7j46624db3rharctcei@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>
\r
29 Subject: Re: muchsync files renames
\r
30 In-Reply-To: <87613tn45m.fsf@freja.aidecoe.name>
\r
31 References: <878u93ujdo.fsf@freja.aidecoe.name>
\r
32 <876146o920.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <871teu8kdd.fsf@freja.aidecoe.name>
\r
33 <87oahxojlv.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <87vbbwnbb4.fsf@freja.aidecoe.name>
\r
34 <87io7wr50y.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <87k2sbmzww.fsf@freja.aidecoe.name>
\r
35 <87oahnmkqf.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <87egijm7kw.fsf@freja.aidecoe.name>
\r
36 <878u8rvxap.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <87613tn45m.fsf@freja.aidecoe.name>
\r
37 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+60~gcb08a2e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
\r
38 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
39 Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:37:09 -0300
\r
40 Message-ID: <87vbbthd1m.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
43 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
44 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
\r
48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
49 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
\r
53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
57 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:38:39 -0000
\r
59 Amadeusz =C5=BBo=C5=82nowski <aidecoe@aidecoe.name> writes:
\r
61 > What's more surprising is that there is a test case in notmuch test
\r
62 > suite which test whether after modifing tag of a mail it is moved from
\r
63 > new/ to cur/. Yes, it should be moved on any tag modification if I
\r
64 > understand correctly. But it seems it does not for my maildirs...
\r
67 If I understand the code correctly, this movement will only happen when
\r
68 one of the maildir-flag-equivalent tags is changed. I haven't dug ack
\r
69 through the archives, but I think mutt uses presence in new/ as some
\r
70 kind of extra unseen state, so people requested not to move files until
\r