91/f16421a65a3bb852be5c512853d16fc1e8b1bd

   1 Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246FD431FD0\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:23:51 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: 0.463\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363] autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id OZ6SfPCjy3cX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:23:50 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net\r
  18         [88.164.105.66])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80440431FB6\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:23:50 -0800 (PST)\r
  21 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])\r
  22         by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9553F2C056;\r
  23         Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:23:48 +0100 (CET)\r
  24 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
  25         :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id\r
  26         :mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=/pH0exXBf2qSmZ5SzC8vDB\r
  27         xRJM8=; b=V7/m7rnSxAG9bcxp2DbzlvB5je9GZOuJ0EYh2hte22fCMlMywsdO5m\r
  28         l3y9MY/HLNqiW9baQh3+f9Otkh/UVW+G85gISOpf3oMxsaO9VobsvAax3IsvdAXa\r
  29         wsnXLPvYNUNVTHiyFvOZRCboeEM5U0s/EiTOt+YN0EnncGftdXclM=\r
  30 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
  31         :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id\r
  32         :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=YIspDPo1ksfUTfjK\r
  33         O1iOPS5YwZeZN2wVamHSm0lZ5SKupIi42RP9eS7veOhq9xZ/4ml2LvLflIWZzme0\r
  34         EzqUSS2HGOF//RrT3t1Mmyo+eSfcn8bV46MgaTOyNdVOZUwRwIpjRTCiOs85GvZw\r
  35         SNnK5MD+ZfWxOENkKK2NpBbWG4Q=\r
  36 Received: from maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net\r
  37         [88.164.105.66])\r
  38         (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
  39         (No client certificate requested)\r
  40         by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;\r
  41         Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:23:48 +0100 (CET)\r
  42 From: Xavier Maillard <xavier@maillard.im>\r
  43 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
  44         Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  45 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.\r
  46 In-Reply-To: <1325005901-21374-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  47 References: <1325005901-21374-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
  49         (i486-slackware-linux-gnu)\r
  50 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:40:42 +0100\r
  51 Message-ID: <m2y5twc1it.fsf@kcals.intra.maillard.im>\r
  52 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  56 Precedence: list\r
  57 Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>\r
  58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  59         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  61         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  66         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  67 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:23:51 -0000\r
  68 \r
  69 Hi Jameson,\r
  70 \r
  71 On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:11:41 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
  72 > It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed\r
  73 > previously.  The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless\r
  74 > and do nothing but add bloat to the database.  It is not worth\r
  75 > indexing the encrypted content, just as it's not worth indexing the\r
  76 > signatures in signed parts.\r
  77 \r
  78 +1 for this.\r
  79 \r
  80 But,\r
  81 \r
  82 > +         if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_ENCRYPTED (multipart)) {\r
  83 > +             /* Don't index encrypted parts. */\r
  84 > +             continue\r
  85 \r
  86 This needs a semicolon, doesn't it ?\r
  87 \r
  88 /Xavier\r