1 Return-Path: <xuwang762@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4626DE00F5
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067,
\r
12 DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
\r
14 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
\r
16 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
17 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
18 with ESMTP id Xm_WAVWigNKF for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
19 Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com
\r
22 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94EDC6DE0032
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f189so171166434oig.3
\r
25 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
27 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
\r
28 :cc; bh=Ul5dgKqV7gEOGO3x7xE7BiTZOQWfENgM76Gfi1ha4PU=;
\r
29 b=mJSouROrVq1GAl7iXZOwCFLE9EHNDXMNy6cqpACfXl9ol9ptLl43PWUKR40w+WSWHe
\r
30 o2rJaIWjETLyV+XsOcdHe9H45Od2/+/7+gdrLXy39mEKt0nqAFC1LTcfkERSLPY7hVNO
\r
31 WNxWil4u1ea4Y4NeUBhLZdy+WBt5AyibWA8WpChozTSD6B/kbHsyUY1Vhw2IZbGgj53F
\r
32 eTB+Of+j5E0hsNLH1ZEtpLpsz9KLy0SlIz+Ox0vQ8gHubU/RSvy1znAlQeXgnYG8OdDz
\r
33 uPNcHbQK5xh/7IQ4sm+S6K2W8rMNd7dPA9imsVQgT8dkjmKLLh1O26fl9cxgcLW+nr+t
\r
35 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
36 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
37 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
\r
38 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
\r
39 bh=Ul5dgKqV7gEOGO3x7xE7BiTZOQWfENgM76Gfi1ha4PU=;
\r
40 b=iOfjnOzPVkBbwBx+VcmG/q+2QCcr0z4HPEJsn8lRMYZlDECrQr0sMK0HSpvqA+3c8Y
\r
41 dpLv6IivX0EnLGGRF/a1PRiKtqrKs3+ecbOjj8dm1a1C0TgtcjBe0Kmq7lTT+rvmT2VL
\r
42 kGvswpgVcFx/C3TAHRd5BvZo/IO/TOh5Bq6Kzee7yGUr47FcloePklnP2hdnRo3fq2eG
\r
43 LGv01OqaSgPotMuNm0fY46SR8LOxgE4ZEGD8A3fFkWKjVjwVzVJ1utHu0RobYU47s0sl
\r
44 R55I+I9jgQTBnVw6F2VJ8+yIA9kHWx8gQFCib7VKuhSL180UG1MXOzn7t3MFRTwU7JzA
\r
46 X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLO3kQGG8FNPrd/Hk7T0AYzj4Vgrew7fbmDZ4pWbg63pRF455KWL+yMgSTfMbZDeimD7sAa3V73CBZdIw==
\r
47 X-Received: by 10.202.4.204 with SMTP id 195mr5082761oie.173.1467570359499;
\r
48 Sun, 03 Jul 2016 11:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
50 Received: by 10.202.212.67 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
51 In-Reply-To: <87inwmyhoi.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
\r
53 <CAJhTkNiWvED4+7kAEWxWOD2PLyskG27vTfSbmZhJFUJcoBqXag@mail.gmail.com>
\r
54 <87inwmyhoi.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
\r
55 From: Xu Wang <xuwang762@gmail.com>
\r
56 Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 14:25:59 -0400
\r
58 <CAJhTkNiGnwDGrshUwBBp2g8ZxXVjNrJMOsfeWru-hUXvzJaYiA@mail.gmail.com>
\r
59 Subject: Re: ask notmuch to find back "reply-to's"
\r
60 To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
61 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
63 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
64 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
\r
66 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
67 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
68 List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
70 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
\r
71 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
72 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
73 List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
74 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
75 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 18:26:11 -0000
\r
77 On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
\r
78 <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
\r
79 > On Sat 2016-07-02 20:28:41 -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
\r
82 >> I have a situation where sometimes I sync a later message. For
\r
83 >> example, the following happens on times:
\r
85 >> 1a. sync message 1.
\r
87 >> 2a. sync message 3 (which replied to message 2)
\r
89 >> 3. sync message 2 (which replied to message 1)
\r
92 >> This happens because of my workflow of offlineimap. It takes a long
\r
93 >> time to sync some folders so often I prefer to skip, but sometimes
\r
94 >> they contain replies.
\r
96 > on most systems, assuming standard headers, notmuch should indeed
\r
97 > assemble these into the same thread.
\r
99 > the relevant headers are In-Reply-To and References.
\r
101 > Can you show those headers for this example? If they have these message-IDs:
\r
107 > then i'd expect the following headers:
\r
111 > <no In-Reply-To or References>
\r
119 > References: XXX, YYY
\r
122 > If notmuch has indexed them all, they should all be part of the same
\r
125 Ah good to know! I will keep eye out for this issue to pop up. I don't
\r
126 have it now since I performed a clean notmuch new to build database.
\r
128 Thank you for detailed response!!
\r