1 Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC6C431FBF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 21:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id gVnXxmdOwhna for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Fri, 9 May 2014 21:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com (mail-ie0-f180.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.223.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274F9431FBC
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 21:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id as1so4976697iec.11
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 09 May 2014 21:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
\r
28 bh=1MRJx7aJo6cy5z9/WehyiJwtmpNaiqfUZ7Ic5MnhrO8=;
\r
29 b=I6GduRrONPf/dKGqvT5WyIT0B099Y6Ci8no3Ls0G+Lz5K1lFY6VG/n+eUgd92254mW
\r
30 B6V7Z4cxDxAg/2joo7m1ibesyNvddUk2PeMd4ChZyf4SJ1XjCbyfLqhOhGewP5DN74GU
\r
31 wG5qDrOUdFfGxrKQxZE0+Uy5X8fRrr2dn8ImjMv9aDl2n4Vzc4v8jFxWWKvpcV4CUg3a
\r
32 pQ2RXchNAnja0FxAoqFPN3Yjz+SZ4j1W4ddcAvLq3+R4ILvvs1wM1ivKDJLUK4t81lSZ
\r
33 qGKC46QhP9R30Rct8WYzEfVB/w1pfVE1z4V/Y/ZQXjT5uvzF664bltvpKGeD8QqqQYNe
\r
35 X-Received: by 10.50.43.170 with SMTP id x10mr17337288igl.36.1399694493625;
\r
36 Fri, 09 May 2014 21:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
\r
37 Received: from localhost (189-211-224-40.static.axtel.net. [189.211.224.40])
\r
38 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hi8sm3773090igb.8.2014.05.09.21.01.31
\r
39 for <multiple recipients>
\r
40 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
41 Fri, 09 May 2014 21:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
\r
42 Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 23:01:28 -0500
\r
43 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
44 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, =?UTF-8?B?WMSrY8Oy?= <xico@atelo.org>
\r
45 Message-ID: <536da4982095d_1ed7ae930416@nysa.notmuch>
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <874n0y5qo5.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
47 References: <20140506194025.GA17097@coyotlan.Tlalpan>
\r
48 <m2mweuhcna.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
49 <87lhucv5b8.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
50 <m2r442oh5j.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
51 <87a9aq5ulz.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
52 <20140510015338.GA1080@coyotlan.atelo.org>
\r
53 <874n0y5qo5.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
54 Subject: Re: pkg-config zlib check in 3c13bc
\r
56 Content-Type: text/plain;
\r
58 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
59 Cc: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
60 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
61 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
63 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
64 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
67 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
68 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
69 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
70 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
71 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
72 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 04:02:01 -0000
\r
74 David Bremner wrote:
\r
75 > X=C4=ABc=C3=B2 <xico@atelo.org> writes:
\r
76 > > As a side note, is there any rationale for the hand-made configure? N=
\r
78 > > that I am a big fan of autoconf/cmake/whatever either...
\r
81 > Carl Worth had a lot of (negative) experience with autoconf when he
\r
82 > started the project, which motivated him to roll his own. Personally I=
\r
84 > don't really think any of the alternatives are convincingly better than=
\r
86 > autoconf. Of course it's one of those very subjective things.
\r
88 I think Makefiles are superior to autoconf. What we have is fine.
\r