1 Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9A3431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id EFEOpR0lUAs0 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 630C4431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so5843345lah.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
\r
27 :message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=RUkpxaykPeAjMEoHTFWvUVxLttl2ncj+rmt6EfuRJCQ=;
\r
29 b=C6qa1puPTdy/UDVxJTcXYVtI1nVrUnv9uNhTXWyb/j2lPBI8GTjn0Gx9a21b5F/kB/
\r
30 iLaXp2Zx5hUWBOy5JMCg+xxgt1OWXESY5z167Ei0nk4dJnhifTF+nGrJ6/8+mHooPYgI
\r
31 KoRoVTBG720grI6jytEnm4yc4HJhEM4wkWsSCu9CjVNrpanub/pC9+3Tsn18KIVzJuYR
\r
32 679CkfYkgMzkq3MeWBHMNlmJuipQ+xFh8QAbxodj7qL3tgoEkqLE6/tTqGdR3dvbEqP/
\r
33 q2GYh4dm0ZIZHE+Z735lAjL+hbFYnq2ZlFFpUoIrZySPhchan/Lx9e1RKl+d7gw/5jxR
\r
35 Received: by 10.152.110.4 with SMTP id hw4mr2181226lab.44.1334756734695;
\r
36 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
\r
37 Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])
\r
38 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm2575868lbd.13.2012.04.18.06.45.33
\r
39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
40 Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
\r
41 From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
42 To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
43 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Add 'compose' command
\r
45 <CAMP44s2Ukz=kDaPHYG+jzR3pDfZGP+6Ojqc4Xz5J8PxEd9fKcQ@mail.gmail.com>
\r
46 References: <1334752753-23970-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
47 <1334752753-23970-2-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
48 <873981chpj.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
49 <CAMP44s2Ukz=kDaPHYG+jzR3pDfZGP+6Ojqc4Xz5J8PxEd9fKcQ@mail.gmail.com>
\r
50 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+104~gf9ad237 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1
\r
51 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
52 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:43:43 +0400
\r
53 Message-ID: <874nshm9yo.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
56 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
61 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
63 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
69 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:45:41 -0000
\r
73 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
\r
75 > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
77 >> Running "notmuch compose" more than once within a second would result in
\r
78 >> identical message ids for the messages, which is not a good idea. That's
\r
79 >> not likely in interactive use, but the notmuch cli is highly scriptable,
\r
80 >> so someone is bound to hit this.
\r
82 >> Some paranoid might also be worried about "leaking" the time you run
\r
83 >> "notmuch compose"... which may be different from the actual time you
\r
84 >> send the message.
\r
86 > It's still better than the current situation; nothing. In any case,
\r
87 > people that have not needed this would not be affected; their UI would
\r
88 > override the Message-ID.
\r
91 I disagree. If notmuch CLI generates a Message-ID, it must be a good
\r
92 one. Otherwise we make users falsely believe that they do have a proper
\r
93 Message-ID while in fact they do not. And that would bite them sooner
\r
99 > So do you have a better suggestion for a Message-ID?
\r
103 > _______________________________________________
\r
104 > notmuch mailing list
\r
105 > notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
106 > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
\r