1 Return-Path: <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BB4431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id vvlE56XMv5pT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
20 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
21 01D82431FAE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:12 -0700
\r
23 Received: by eekb47 with SMTP id b47so1243212eek.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
\r
27 :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
\r
28 bh=DLeCNdMPG91iDl7hWViYYPntC4fG9blpMbLihJND7/0=;
\r
29 b=FhTzsXkJT0tc4gL1z9P75dvwjnXZsEfnQACCrZcD25HeaGoeJUXwocriXDAiVM7JuE
\r
30 C7KZydeeuZVPhSuF8en6tTMMcCPCcT3leSwMJjT9ycYbzLEY27mw+i1wjG79/d16IHe2
\r
31 qjSghOUgWjOAeyBg7GVdxuIYE0comAqyfwlQTPnE/xTPIGFdR2EAm9oOb95CtmFDVtqo
\r
32 /EHRYTnwn7uM1nuuXkCBZOxrttka9sx9SYZm9qlEi71nmD+U5xcaMu843vQ37O/3rRUm
\r
33 Wt4e4MqIVWsn+KaP65RjEjt4QwRUoITmu+y3PexBndlSZldZtH1NIsbYFF12v3jrU6hi
\r
35 Received: by 10.180.91.10 with SMTP id ca10mr4604258wib.17.1333019829990;
\r
36 Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
\r
37 Received: from sid.nuvreauspam ([92.86.142.199])
\r
38 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n20sm16183464wiw.5.2012.03.29.04.17.07
\r
39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
40 Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
\r
41 Received: by sid.nuvreauspam (Postfix, from userid 1077)
\r
42 id C460FC037F; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:17:05 +0300 (EEST)
\r
43 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:17:05 +0300
\r
44 From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
\r
45 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 Subject: notmuch and Debian's BTS/PTS [was: Re: [Joerg Jaspert] Bug#666027:
\r
47 notmuch: get a quiet option]
\r
48 Message-ID: <20120329111705.GU4122@sid.nuvreauspam>
\r
49 References: <87ty19pi85.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
50 <87vcloshss.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
51 <87limjpufs.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
53 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
\r
54 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lX3hbvz5zFyKlV8s"
\r
55 Content-Disposition: inline
\r
56 In-Reply-To: <87limjpufs.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
57 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
62 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:17:15 -0000
\r
74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
75 Content-Disposition: inline
\r
76 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
78 On Jo, 29 mar 12, 07:34:15, David Bremner wrote:
\r
79 > We could give it a try and see how it works. I suspect it needs the
\r
80 > assistance of one of the notmuch list moderators (which I understand we
\r
81 > have delegates for as of a few days ago) to get the BTS able to send to
\r
82 > the list. Any Debian savvy volunteers to sort this out?
\r
84 If there's something I can do...
\r
86 Does it make sense to subscribe the list to PTS[1] instead? I'd say the=20
\r
87 bts, bts-control, buildd, default and contact keywords[2] make sense.
\r
89 [1] Package Tracking System
\r
90 [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/resources.html#p=
\r
96 If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
\r
100 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
\r
101 Content-Description: Digital signature
\r
103 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
104 Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
\r
106 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPdESxAAoJEHNWs3jeoi3pWKoH/1p0p38FmMZNQ5bfz4NhGjHK
\r
107 Nw8y0MwG7NUMSrBBzmgBJzAhZbR42wfcsyXMn6QZBAhUzM0ReFoDYncBRuq/5BSR
\r
108 C9drodQNobPCu2CpjB58HTpokHxKXUiyPb6ABsNawk8KAAyD/r7DWIUjOcILTZAK
\r
109 nOTznYM96zeug4YrgsqAiNCvZU5T48Rf/8hgh04+8bb1oTkxI297Fe4XsDofar4C
\r
110 0xwVVTGbmJVYrPum2cdEyxWcXJ6K+GhFoQUztbqwnV8OrDI1e8TXBxRdOFm7aTLr
\r
111 BrPBjqFcJ3FlOab62plXnMiZa3z0BAvuBWk1sXbI+uNOOiKf0u1qpoUImHayj7w=
\r
113 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
115 --lX3hbvz5zFyKlV8s--
\r