1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3C1431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 6ceaRwXLp74m for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96C6431FBC
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
\r
21 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
22 by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4C766E01C7;
\r
23 Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new
\r
25 Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-107-185-189-81.socal.res.rr.com
\r
26 [107.185.189.81]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)
\r
27 by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B2A66E0178;
\r
28 Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
\r
29 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
30 id 06BF060187; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
\r
31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
32 To: john.wyzer@gmx.de, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
\r
33 Guyzmo <guyzmo+notmuch@m0g.net>
\r
34 Subject: Re: Feature suggestion. Indexing encrypted mail?
\r
35 In-Reply-To: <867g71y327.fsf@someserver.somewhere>
\r
36 References: <86k3b3ybo6.fsf@someserver.somewhere>
\r
37 <878urj1z3j.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
38 <87txa7pp8z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
39 <20140406091516.GG26903@vilya.m0g.net>
\r
40 <5341D252.90405@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
41 <867g71y327.fsf@someserver.somewhere>
\r
42 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+174~gaa1f476 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
43 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
44 Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 08:57:27 -0700
\r
45 Message-ID: <87ob0dnndk.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
47 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
48 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
49 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@debian.org>
\r
50 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
51 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
53 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
54 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
55 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
57 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
58 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
60 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
62 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 15:57:40 -0000
\r
65 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
67 On Mon, Apr 07 2014, john.wyzer@gmx.de wrote:
\r
68 >> confess i haven't been following closely), it wouldn't be much extra
\r
69 >> effort for someone to implement a filter that strips encryption from the
\r
70 >> message. (this might still have the problem mentioned above about also
\r
71 >> stripping PGP/MIME signatures, but the signatures and the decrypted
\r
72 >> message itself would remain intact so they could be shown directly by
\r
73 >> notmuch show without trouble).
\r
75 > I don't understand that. :-(
\r
76 > This sounds as if the view of the message is not generated from the
\r
77 > mail storage. Isn't the purpose of the index to find the appropriate
\r
78 > message file and everything else is generated from that file?
\r
80 I think that's exactly what Daniel is saying: what's viewed comes from
\r
81 the message directly, and not from the db.
\r
86 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
88 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
91 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTQsroAAoJEO00zqvie6q8aYwP/Rk0R7BW8vQd+VtvzWYC1N9j
\r
92 uC32nGscmg17Pwr0Sky6/cIniO+WoESV77HmD7T4MJNEXwRqQxOc34V8NZ4Qa4PP
\r
93 jlal8DkePkrgjvTWegXgIEQ9i0mpq4/TJjQ0xXgKPPr6xIuIJc+7KrasYt9y7LWQ
\r
94 qMq63FEjvoTWYxv0Eb3fQoFQ2DueJxtP/DPGQjRqYspmitCKMhW/AQkM/XgEjSx/
\r
95 Nnu4ofC3R/Jk3uIEOKxO+TFKrB/Y/3jsr9cG696OO3/eNgY9QIm9hvWTcCdNQZTe
\r
96 zLdk8RMkS06M4LgORaULx/qXhPQeMZiY1UXTn8RBMtmwShQj5yVLpvC/+llJbz5G
\r
97 b+ZeKeQmGWFMtj3iVA5y9mTLbG2uoGOYDlD8YWs8BweabQGQxtzO7aIcOzBuUy/A
\r
98 QG5LV+nCJRjT48LoahTna2nmT39sfHvkmrimrCgnPgllLeoq49HpevL0UUVIM3b2
\r
99 RSStinJe3JZFBfQHlLCF2ziXWcI36ardJoEcLRtQG1+qC53O4cW7s71CrEt4JsIF
\r
100 fNWeR6EGiVfv5a9zFby9KJKT3f/kKM4gNTkCloIi+xPL6T55iFx8ioh6oDlJvSoN
\r
101 OJDigVPjICypfcHtkt/sIjPVSnmTsbwXZteMJ9QSAKUz+YxPmCWXGHfrI5l/tTLn
\r
102 Ka+ax1bWu8yeRgJ/vZFT
\r
104 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r