1 Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011AB431FBF;
\r
6 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:47:14 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
9 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
10 with ESMTP id 64GuWRHp4qKU; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:47:13 -0800 (PST)
\r
11 Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
12 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AAD431FAE;
\r
13 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:47:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
14 From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
15 To: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
\r
16 In-Reply-To: <20091121193606.GD24602@excalibur.local>
\r
17 References: <20091121145111.GB19397@excalibur.local>
\r
18 <87fx874xj5.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
19 <20091121193606.GD24602@excalibur.local>
\r
20 Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:47:00 +0100
\r
21 Message-ID: <87vdh338sb.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
24 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
25 Subject: Re: [notmuch] 25 minutes load time with emacs -f notmuch
\r
26 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
27 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
\r
29 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
30 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
31 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
32 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
33 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
34 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
35 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
36 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
37 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
38 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:47:14 -0000
\r
40 On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:36:06 +0100, Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org> wrote:
\r
41 > Yup, I had the repo on my disk a week before Keith blogged about it. Just nice
\r
42 > that it was going crazy that fast and people start using it and contributing to
\r
45 Yes, it's quite fun.
\r
47 > > Though, frankly, I think we need to fix "notmuch new" to do much better
\r
48 > > than 40 files/sec.
\r
50 > As a sidenote. That one is on a notebook with a slow 5400 disk and crypt + lvm +
\r
51 > ext3 on top. Perhaps I should put some money back for an X25 SSD. ;)
\r
53 Sure. But I think we can still do a lot better even on your machine. :-)
\r
55 > I have to admit it took me some time. Something like below should help?
\r
57 Thanks so much! I committed this, (and then added a bit more
\r
58 documentation on top of it).
\r
60 > I think that's what I will try to get working here. Sounds the nearest solution
\r
61 > to my problem. That in combination with the just merged tags-based-on-folders
\r
62 > patch should make me a lot happier. :)
\r
64 Well, do note that I just reverted that patch too. :-/
\r
66 So you might want to cherry-pick it back (or even add the configuration
\r
67 option that will let us push it back out again).
\r