1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BFF431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id Q37ev5DBT4P4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sun, 12 May 2013 13:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com (mail-lb0-f174.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.217.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99571431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id r10so5649795lbi.5
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=google.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=x-received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
\r
27 :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
\r
28 bh=CxKdxW/cHVKElXxiK5SNdNhyVBl9MPQbBaqXiTU05VE=;
\r
29 b=oCrRY1Fi5ERQKqkSZIADsHT1aaWYqsT66lPcrZDCijvENfGKU2C3zWD3VgHLM5K2w/
\r
30 narYlrVRaqmbPRJX3PeqdCG7PVRgRuVvKsl1pJnLciy0U1tZO5q9OZrk1dO9CFtboHUL
\r
31 UYm5Xv/LtolpRQJfNlnx2JZTunblDmQadc2C4MAmVonJ5AgxiFqzqL9qFdBXX2jvL049
\r
32 pASikafMkCxknbZfabAzFEXN90yHjnpShAgvjSQuJ6rM3jqD82tOlMMq5gBP9bPLCQ39
\r
33 GHkeR0vI16UvO9XFGShmSmuNsMuHdRSQKRG9q4TrFo29MJ+ySpqRmWtaRWO4qC7Ox5/a
\r
35 X-Received: by 10.152.120.40 with SMTP id kz8mr11806922lab.30.1368392021086;
\r
36 Sun, 12 May 2013 13:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
37 Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw2-58c376-211.dhcp.inet.fi.
\r
39 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c5sm3408997lbe.1.2013.05.12.13.53.39
\r
40 for <multiple recipients>
\r
41 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
\r
42 Sun, 12 May 2013 13:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
43 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
44 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Allow widen reply
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <1368303344-13713-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
47 References: <1368303344-13713-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+87~gc69f540 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
49 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
50 Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 23:53:37 +0300
\r
51 Message-ID: <878v3japim.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
53 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
55 ALoCoQm+eE1k/xFZ2AeZAqmpZ+uflulhz31wbCbEOSWZo0JM1bb4WCe4wHson6YeqE2f5xdZsDmC
\r
56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
60 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
67 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
68 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 20:53:48 -0000
\r
73 On Sat, 11 May 2013, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
74 > This is an initial draft of a patch to allow the emacs frontend to
\r
75 > "widen" the reply: i.e., change the headers to reply-to-all after a
\r
76 > reply-to-sender has been started.
\r
78 I didn't look at the patches very much, but I like the idea, a lot. This
\r
79 is the way it should be.
\r
81 > There are some things that need to be worked out: do we want to allow
\r
82 > narrowing the reply (ie going from reply-to-all back to
\r
83 > reply-to-sender)? I did not implement this as it was slightly easier
\r
84 > not to, message-mode doesn't have this by default, and it's easy for a
\r
85 > user to remove recipients.
\r
87 Might be useful, but can be added later on.
\r
89 The same for better handling of mail-followup-to: and reply-to:. For
\r
90 those, I'm not sure if a keybinding for "widening" the recipients is the
\r
91 right choice, as they both mean *changing*, not necessarily widening the
\r
92 recipient list. Maybe you can come up with an approach here that extends
\r
93 well to those too later on. ;)
\r