86/0f96a1ca3892bec06f5f3da4736e54f862a757

   1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD624431FB6\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:01:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id T1v6nl3vfGHO for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:01:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com\r
  19         [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))\r
  20         (No client certificate requested)\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F36E431FAF\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:01:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by pbbrr13 with SMTP id rr13so12887502pbb.26\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:01:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
  26         h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version\r
  27         :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;\r
  28         bh=tlDt/Wltdq1yAxUtKMkpAF+vivxXzIt/tmLLICpwOjY=;\r
  29         b=LI1jqAtBU1B96WzwSCtPnvVGWqpXXDr443AQkttW8NFGG+vP9Sqo4KKCafD6O/ozBV\r
  30         z6WHS9Y5VnWwEwWenJR2CXRBzWS6cACNKnolU7vKYsaOVdlLsGZlaP7Jx8tKMkNObRqS\r
  31         2UDp+RHAeaduYIZHPyHMoE0FY6btNTMyFRpl6Gt+UYc2Y6fbmFLRdtmH6NF7MGhaRsGd\r
  32         XH19YTBO0/AcNWHJ8rA7pZIcNEuiByE1G2FizMRnOHjNYo9VtfaDH5VqhasEIbxk2efH\r
  33         fLEi9rA3sGwx258M28lcdjgT6uAupVu9IpY72ERxiNQ/jNoBmdGz/s+QMw5VvOQq7Xsn\r
  34         1UCA==\r
  35 Received: by 10.68.226.99 with SMTP id rr3mr69605104pbc.48.1340154112219;\r
  36         Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:01:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
  37 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
  38         [220.233.42.215])\r
  39         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ob9sm29805404pbb.28.2012.06.19.18.01.47\r
  40         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
  41         Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:01:50 -0700 (PDT)\r
  42 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:01:39 +1000\r
  43 Message-ID: <20120620110139.GA2356@hili.localdomain>\r
  44 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
  45 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  46 Subject: Re: Notmuch Pick\r
  47 In-Reply-To: <87zk7z2kz2.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  48 References: <87395ump0d.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
  49         <87zk80ilt9.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  50         <87mx3zok3d.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
  51         <87zk7z2kz2.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  52 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
  54 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  55 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
  56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  58 Precedence: list\r
  59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  60         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  67         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  68 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:01:55 -0000\r
  69 \r
  70 On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:52:01 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
  71 > \r
  72 > So I think it would be nice and clean if the default json output\r
  73 > included all the message headers and the message structure, and then\r
  74 > part contents could be retrieved individually.  I imagine show mode\r
  75 > could be restructured such that it could use this efficiently.\r
  76 \r
  77 Whatever is done, please keep the option to return all message bodies at\r
  78 once, at least for short threads (the common case).  I want them anyway.\r
  79 Don't force me to make N separate requests, especially over a high\r
  80 latency link.\r
  81 \r
  82 Peter\r