85/58a53a4479a28b8f2d14edaad97c43a783f81c

   1 Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B838431FD0\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:23:23 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: 0\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
  12         autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id 9iuBoZHLXuTl for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:23:21 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108])\r
  18         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD536431FB6\r
  19         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:23:21 -0800 (PST)\r
  20 Received: from [192.168.1.91] (adsl-74-242-247-77.rmo.bellsouth.net\r
  21         [74.242.247.77])\r
  22         by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04F3EF970\r
  23         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:23:16 -0500 (EST)\r
  24 Message-ID: <4EF9D4CE.5020502@fifthhorseman.net>\r
  25 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:23:10 -0500\r
  26 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
  27 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111120 Icedove/8.0\r
  28 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  29 To: "notmuch@notmuchmail.org" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  30 Subject: Re: S/MIME support in notmuch\r
  31 References: <87iplrwz0k.fsf@bryandb1-ll1.dom1.jhuapl.edu>\r
  32         <87aa6m6t3u.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
  33         <87mxajnsvq.fsf@bryandb1-ll1.dom1.jhuapl.edu>\r
  34 In-Reply-To: <87mxajnsvq.fsf@bryandb1-ll1.dom1.jhuapl.edu>\r
  35 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3\r
  36 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;\r
  37         protocol="application/pgp-signature";\r
  38         boundary="------------enig276FAFE17C426E398309EA34"\r
  39 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  40 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  41 Precedence: list\r
  42 Reply-To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  43 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  44         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  45 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  46         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  47 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  48 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  49 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  50 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  51         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  52 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:23:23 -0000\r
  53 \r
  54 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)\r
  55 --------------enig276FAFE17C426E398309EA34\r
  56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
  57 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  58 \r
  59 On 12/23/2011 11:40 AM, Dan Bryant wrote:\r
  60 > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 06:51:01 -0500, Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@f=\r
  61 ernseed.info> wrote:\r
  62 >> When you make those changes to the gpg_context are you breaking gpg\r
  63 >> signature validation?  Or is the one a superset of the other?\r
  64 >=20\r
  65 > The current assumption in notmuch is that all encrypted/signed messages=\r
  66 \r
  67 > in a mailbox will be using the same crypto algorithm. This is the first=\r
  68 \r
  69 > thing I want to fix: which crypto algorithm (and therefore, context\r
  70 > object) to use should probably be detected by the MIME type of the\r
  71 > message part.\r
  72 \r
  73 This was an issue i was hoping would get resolved in gmime 2.6, but\r
  74 apparently it's still open:\r
  75 \r
  76   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D641848\r
  77 \r
  78 So it does look like we're going to need to do the detection and\r
  79 selecion ourselves.\r
  80 \r
  81         --dkg\r
  82 \r
  83 \r
  84 --------------enig276FAFE17C426E398309EA34\r
  85 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
  86 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature\r
  87 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"\r
  88 \r
  89 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  90 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
  91 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/\r
  92 \r
  93 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJO+dTOXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w\r
  94 ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwRUU1QkU5NzkyODJEODBCOUY3NTQwRjFD\r
  95 Q0QyRUQ5NEQyMTczOUU5AAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpDMsP/RE517IVhwqYtZYF/KsJoylE\r
  96 bRhOSh5UTIddj1M56oSPirF3FFQVhmYTIzwAPMGcs6A7ssOmTybUJwCD1T8Xa4pY\r
  97 ef1GnWkYN3KTxyZ80Q4BO8SBOJU7o/9TC/hkVeELL1gVhLHwLEYtw0uXo6ZSqexM\r
  98 MqMogiOGeNPXNh1NWBrnhPA2zAOZNcJ9oRlyygbkjRlshbYszlN8lhhlvC8S2g37\r
  99 MpPK+1oyR8oHNDLab1RyRc1t6xGl76dHjrlsc74kJzG7vD96BNp2FiY86aVD9Dw4\r
 100 ISx2TXB38x1NZwTkevyQJLLMqYGPTPLfFk0LMmL0C8fi5FlB0I26K2cmMy5MUzQO\r
 101 qlrmvxJPxTdwLT2ahUkqI2SLMSvuAbG3UwT4bybVpA2HA0Wv6mWyw6mX2IMUavQ7\r
 102 kxmgvNBrbj5+Ggkcu5kHUQEPQpiO8ItkKJ0a3aIQfQzurpWJ6OweZZgcokOKxjt2\r
 103 i1C/ssBttxGFICjx/Q75KU331sqsm+CuZi4PtdBFeCbkl/X4g6M6Xo2KmeLK0gFV\r
 104 T9rUUlgsaMPOZwGaBtseMfnTle5hbrnDgx2+OPe7vasqdmNiXRjW2WjqgJos7tU6\r
 105 5u94YHQphrb88WjSloA3fTTfYwUZe+N1YIPSZ1puQNZXm0vZnI4JdzRMuv5qhDZJ\r
 106 QtUDPTcsdrSei7wdj434\r
 107 =zghN\r
 108 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 109 \r
 110 --------------enig276FAFE17C426E398309EA34--\r