1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2888A4048D2
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:00:35 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[AWL=-0.410, BAYES_40=-0.185] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id zSDKBCQY96sV for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:00:34 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from homiemail-a11.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D454048D0
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:00:34 -0800 (PST)
\r
21 Received: from sspaeth.de (unknown [84.55.211.9])
\r
22 by homiemail-a11.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EA01B194074;
\r
23 Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:00:31 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
\r
25 Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:00:29 +0100
\r
26 From: "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
27 To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>, Michal Sojka
\r
28 <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, James Vasile <james@hackervisions.org>,
\r
29 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
30 In-Reply-To: <87pr395zvi.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
31 References: <87aauhp9kk.fsf@hackervisions.org>
\r
32 <87pr3bm2sn.fsf@steelpick.localdomain>
\r
33 <87fx46hq7w.fsf@hackervisions.org>
\r
34 <87ljdyn7zi.fsf@steelpick.localdomain>
\r
35 <876352hccg.fsf@softwarefreedom.org>
\r
36 <87iq92m12o.fsf@steelpick.localdomain>
\r
37 <87pr395zvi.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
38 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:00:29 +0100
\r
39 Message-ID: <87ljdxpm1u.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
42 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Change From and Bcc when creating reply draft
\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
48 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:00:35 -0000
\r
58 On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:22:09 -0500, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
59 > To me it seems the issue here is the distinction between the notmuch
\r
60 > CLI, and any other reader UI that uses it. AFAICT, the CLI actually has
\r
61 > no need to know what "your" email address is, so I don't see why it
\r
62 > should be configured in the notmuch config. Your reader on the other
\r
63 > hand does need to know, so it should be set there.
\r
65 +1. Except for making the "from:~me" synonym available for searches :)
\r
67 > This is related to another current pet peeve of mine which is that
\r
68 > notmuch puts my email address in the Bcc: field in my response template.
\r
69 > I do not want to bcc myself on my responses. Generally, I don't think
\r
70 > it should be the business of the CLI to set any of the header fields in
\r
71 > mail that I send out.
\r
73 +1 I agree. The mailer should be putting a BCC in, if that is what the
\r
74 user wants, not notmuch
\r