1 Return-Path: <xavier@maillard.im>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FA5418C34
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1]
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id GsGP-meTBkVu for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [82.244.211.40])
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3493418C37
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
\r
21 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj [127.0.0.1])
\r
22 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358061E077;
\r
23 Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:24:17 +0200 (CEST)
\r
24 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
\r
25 :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version
\r
26 :content-type; s=postfix; bh=VhXikwQCiLospmaQeC6xb4o/d6U=; b=HwR
\r
27 YYScJYDjBxhUeWq2aUWBlnROfnenwpOERwi6cOUynjmUWHS/9yt9UJqE9ZiaUlUx
\r
28 0K9MBDwQpo8PvCydyOmAB1LstHS4241Nu/FKSfdxrTOykCZzrQpEp6IA/Pev0+a9
\r
29 4msIo9aR3RFOOjCn0scxvhqD3XFeXoQbmtSIyvXU=
\r
30 Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254])
\r
31 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
32 (No client certificate requested)
\r
33 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
\r
34 Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:24:17 +0200 (CEST)
\r
35 From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
\r
36 To: Mark Anderson <MarkR.Anderson@amd.com>, Jesse Rosenthal
\r
37 <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>, "notmuch\@notmuchmail.org" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
38 Subject: Re: [notmuch] Bulk message tagging
\r
39 In-Reply-To: <3wdmxxg4axm.fsf@testarossa.amd.com>
\r
40 References: <m2tyrrkf32.fsf@deb.maillard.im> <87sk7b30tg.fsf@jhu.edu>
\r
41 <m2bpdye86s.fsf@deb.maillard.im> <3wdmxxg4axm.fsf@testarossa.amd.com>
\r
42 Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:56:48 +0200
\r
43 Message-ID: <m2wrwf76n3.fsf@deb.maillard.im>
\r
45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
46 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
47 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
49 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
50 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
52 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
53 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
54 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
55 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
56 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
58 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:24:19 -0000
\r
62 On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:51:01 -0600, Mark Anderson <MarkR.Anderson@amd.com> wrote:
\r
64 > I think that '*' is definitely an awesome command, but I wonder if we
\r
65 > shouldn't have another command for the notmuch-search buffer which means
\r
66 > 'tag all the threads that I can see in this buffer'.
\r
68 This is exactly what my initial post asked for. '*' is not
\r
69 totally satisfying for me due to the "limitations" you
\r
70 exposed. Though It is a good and acceptable workaround for me.
\r
71 As said, I just have to pay attention to redo my search query
\r
72 before pressing the '*' key.
\r