Re: Linking a privately built -lxapian
[notmuch-archives.git] / 7d / 77dd7923be58e3e059353fd6ae8f488dc775cb
1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0A3431FC2\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  1 May 2014 12:47:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id RHbm6QhrIeQG for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Thu,  1 May 2014 12:47:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
17 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com\r
18         [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
19         (No client certificate requested)\r
20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A12D7431FBF\r
21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  1 May 2014 12:47:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
22 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hi5so397796wib.11\r
23         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 01 May 2014 12:47:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
25         d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
26         h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent\r
27         :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
28         bh=3xHItB9DHetiiaS4RFgznfvERV9LPl8DfPJLLA6Wq5I=;\r
29         b=Sc3XjwCf+bHsesBP6QxuIB1lnBEIQ4QDsD5nF/HlGR4nFmySwYQPVRd6Bus4LPj6vz\r
30         Y9yjU5coVTMojPS/u9U7/M3mGYBZe/zqA1QxK0YtrFfFKMg+wM9iB2xHLbwUtKfQaECG\r
31         WuENIBmD1pTnF8M/Kh1Y9XdVRNLaVMyseEsepuVFidOAjzaT3uWvBieMpGvZtyXXy//z\r
32         LqxGHL9Tv0WC/1dkL342DZil1joe3fwQ4KlCZYf9X0lkFIam/yXqpfxqQF4qX0G1UbXv\r
33         Sxc5NHxifB8A8i3vVuzze/ObBrmQbH2Bvc58uxIay++QWnZlle6W02p+4AGgdBJmV6G8\r
34         z0pw==\r
35 X-Gm-Message-State:\r
36  ALoCoQkJzZJ5RDqegAGyDxOPW1pe4lUKHz93Z8TEyF1SizFppOZrsJnn1Cl+SJptwy4sKinXMQHa\r
37 X-Received: by 10.194.191.133 with SMTP id gy5mr10575917wjc.34.1398973638140; \r
38         Thu, 01 May 2014 12:47:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
39 Received: from localhost ([2a01:348:1a2:1:a288:b4ff:fe8a:77d8])\r
40         by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm5647420wiz.1.2014.05.01.12.47.16\r
41         for <multiple recipients>\r
42         (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
43         Thu, 01 May 2014 12:47:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
44 To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
45 Subject: Re: [PATCH] NEWS: folder:, path:, and database upgrade\r
46 In-Reply-To: <1398609977-9943-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>\r
47 References: <1398609977-9943-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18~rc0 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1\r
49         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
50 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
51 Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 20:47:14 +0100\r
52 Message-ID: <cunwqe5jn7h.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
53 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
54 Content-Type: text/plain\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
57 Precedence: list\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
59         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
61         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
66         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 19:47:25 -0000\r
68 \r
69 On Sun, Apr 27 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:\r
70 > +The `folder:` search prefix now requires an exact match\r
71 \r
72 I think that it would be clearer to say:\r
73 \r
74   The `folder:` search prefix no longer supports wildcard matching\r
75 \r
76 (Or something like that.)\r