79/f4cd0d2293c6f43325d4f6c68453377ca287ff

   1 Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7C940DBFA\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:23:09 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -1.899\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id SRU7LUMXNo6v for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:22:58 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org (rodolpho.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.107])\r
  18         (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
  19         (No client certificate requested)\r
  20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099A140DBF8\r
  21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:22:58 -0800 (PST)\r
  22 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
  23         by rodolpho.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967FA3CD52\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:22:55 -0500 (EST)\r
  25 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at rodolpho.mayfirst.org\r
  26 Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  27         by localhost (rodolpho.mayfirst.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,\r
  28         port 10024) with ESMTP id JnfwG3jR+0U9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  29         Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:22:55 -0500 (EST)\r
  30 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender:\r
  31         smtpauth@rodolpho.mayfirst.org) with ESMTPSA id 6A53D3CD4C\r
  32 Message-ID: <4CE2E819.1070808@fifthhorseman.net>\r
  33 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:22:49 -0500\r
  34 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
  35 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;\r
  36         rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100918 Icedove/3.1.4\r
  37 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  38 To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  39 Subject: Re: a proposed change to JSON output to report verification of\r
  40         PGP/MIME signatures.\r
  41 References: <4CDE4486.2050101@fifthhorseman.net>\r
  42         <87hbfhdpa6.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  43         <87wrod9gh8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  44 In-Reply-To: <87wrod9gh8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  45 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2\r
  46 OpenPGP: id=D21739E9\r
  47 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;\r
  48         protocol="application/pgp-signature";\r
  49         boundary="------------enigEAA542691534BFC02E222EB0"\r
  50 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  51 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  52 Precedence: list\r
  53 Reply-To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  55         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  57         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  63 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:23:09 -0000\r
  64 \r
  65 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)\r
  66 --------------enigEAA542691534BFC02E222EB0\r
  67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
  68 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  69 \r
  70 On 11/16/2010 03:10 PM, Jameson Rollins wrote:\r
  71 > I would almost say that --verify should be the\r
  72 > default, with a --no-verify option.  It will make things much easier fo=\r
  73 r\r
  74 > all the UIs if notmuch handles the verification and just outputs the\r
  75 > result.\r
  76 \r
  77 For clients that do not know how to interpret/display the verification\r
  78 results, i don't want the backend to incur the cost of verification that\r
  79 will be thrown away.\r
  80 \r
  81 For clients that do understand how to interpret/display the verification\r
  82 results, well, they can understand how to use the --verify flag too :)\r
  83 \r
  84         --dkg\r
  85 \r
  86 \r
  87 --------------enigEAA542691534BFC02E222EB0\r
  88 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
  89 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature\r
  90 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"\r
  91 \r
  92 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  93 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
  94 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/\r
  95 \r
  96 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJM4ugaAAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpwpkQAKZtEuv4VD2l8+CvJe6HhDEf\r
  97 X/PtgfyTJ1hrubfkpvLCC3dq9CXfr75NQjr+oAoPwKFqBQzYVpkiQsvpjLc+5vrY\r
  98 nbALnpzuaMvg0soJFx3QnracMmqgHitzz3eiydQ09NJ6eya5Ir6E3fmEzktU3fy2\r
  99 rnMQlz/VwFTuAMyIoyCZsJr2K6S7KUw10Y4rT5EMfnysMAp+alp4mRgDPTAdcQeF\r
 100 ZFKLjrlOLeXj+6lRyIZwvyaiWU+bdjSk2WYV+y6mi6YZIUdtP3znJ2c+uitlZwRm\r
 101 vBVyHqicAfF9f7BiuBsX9oUnjGoI1Lm+6u11Xh8/8iwkgAv21gg7RCAJjp/tI1DP\r
 102 bPtW/GPZWUzlK82jO2wK+3R9kyBJf1nZoxq377UHuYqDQxsISEjctWT4E3DLPhmf\r
 103 DnungNJR0cNSQaUTUfBQXdy70GURm3X4CDjgyWn4k1echWZTXDtE35XB93dCBEQV\r
 104 5b1vjX8I9Xs0vVLOkp6CwxPK0Y/VgsWgFF31c+Kxbh+dRMk+SRYPs0ncUEywrsfm\r
 105 Rghd9eWiguJXICl7yV/eey1362lhcxg/xxlH4LDjWTzGo5/RklHaqyN9GdJIZCJw\r
 106 3g2x1Jhu7pOzmEzq+gEiQjiCwiEYEicAnWgMczapgQGitZsoqQeprvgPjqaqxQiN\r
 107 YB5WXws9KPackAKacm7X\r
 108 =9HYv\r
 109 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 110 \r
 111 --------------enigEAA542691534BFC02E222EB0--\r