1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC55431FC0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:53:35 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id VjpXVZTDX4hE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:53:27 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-ve0-f182.google.com (mail-ve0-f182.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.128.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E51D4431FBD
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:53:26 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: by mail-ve0-f182.google.com with SMTP id jy13so8683093veb.13
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 14:53:26 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
26 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
\r
27 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
\r
28 bh=8Xv9pJDuU2pgYNcoQzTvWNdVP30H9sS29wC380egCNk=;
\r
29 b=NXeB9K7P8wo5pjMg+gTB7RYgICWTr0NqK26SaC/vszG8t0Ec/QmzdKXYfUuoL4ZGIk
\r
30 aqEi0kxVbSlCu5KWwsBs3mFVFqwqgMxCvrSnn3uFg/EZMG2dBXS59nfCPfvKhP0Dw7hs
\r
31 PSOa7meyPl2wM3J/zhgRm0cjjgz37ceJRPXxQQi0uSp3tVURbU8c1Uhv0uARrPB5v0wD
\r
32 EV+z03KjVlURO7o+79q/5kp9hLLqY8v7zGEodR9XikI9Zvkj1zJ55usKyUjE5Bqs7mgH
\r
33 +Z31ac37s2FQXLzhtpe8mDhLZaSK1Jb/LD5Muqj6UINRVkc26sFaXQp3U1aRZ1XBX8OS
\r
36 ALoCoQkJmPUObs4W/S9SF9IRP0WBu6OrWwwwY09Po/t47cYnZQ/avMOiYEsuuhSBOC+oheFwg6jH
\r
38 X-Received: by 10.58.57.194 with SMTP id k2mr17294685veq.0.1388876005180; Sat,
\r
39 04 Jan 2014 14:53:25 -0800 (PST)
\r
40 Received: by 10.58.143.6 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:53:25 -0800 (PST)
\r
41 Received: by 10.58.143.6 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:53:25 -0800 (PST)
\r
42 In-Reply-To: <20140104223742.GC16514@danbala.tuwien.ac.at>
\r
43 References: <20140103214735.GG27614@danbala.tuwien.ac.at>
\r
44 <sfid-H20140104-145824-+018.98-1@spamfilter.osbf.lua>
\r
45 <871u0nnaw8.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
46 <20140104223742.GC16514@danbala.tuwien.ac.at>
\r
47 Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 00:53:25 +0200
\r
49 <CAB+hUn8FhAfpGBmyULM0RKpcDDOAem2JA_neazAkXh5xFA=kkw@mail.gmail.com>
\r
50 Subject: Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue;
\r
51 clang visibility problem
\r
52 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
53 To: Thomas Klausner <tk@giga.or.at>
\r
54 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11369b0eed1d6904ef2ce417
\r
55 Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
60 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
67 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
68 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:53:35 -0000
\r
70 --001a11369b0eed1d6904ef2ce417
\r
71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
73 On Jan 5, 2014 12:38 AM, "Thomas Klausner" <tk@giga.or.at> wrote:
\r
75 > On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 09:18:15AM -0400, David Bremner wrote:
\r
76 > > I'm not sure what the right answer is here. MATHPATHLEN (and PATH_MAX)
\r
77 > > are not necessarily defined; in particular this would break
\r
78 > > compilation on GNU Hurd. Perhaps we should ship a compatibility
\r
79 > > implementation of a POSIX.1-2008 compatible [1] realpath. Or maybe
\r
80 > > realpath can be avoided completely here.
\r
82 > A compatibility implementation for POSIX.1-2008-realpath would be
\r
83 > great, as would be avoiding the call. Why is it necessary to resolve
\r
86 realpath is used to follow, not overwrite symlinks.
\r
88 --001a11369b0eed1d6904ef2ce417
\r
89 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
\r
92 On Jan 5, 2014 12:38 AM, "Thomas Klausner" <<a href="mailto:tk@giga.or.at">tk@giga.or.at</a>> wrote:<br>
\r
94 > On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 09:18:15AM -0400, David Bremner wrote:<br>
\r
95 > > I'm not sure what the right answer is here. MATHPATHLEN (and PATH_MAX)<br>
\r
96 > > are not necessarily defined; in particular this would break<br>
\r
97 > > compilation on GNU Hurd. Perhaps we should ship a compatibility<br>
\r
98 > > implementation of a POSIX.1-2008 compatible [1] realpath. Or maybe<br>
\r
99 > > realpath can be avoided completely here.<br>
\r
101 > A compatibility implementation for POSIX.1-2008-realpath would be<br>
\r
102 > great, as would be avoiding the call. Why is it necessary to resolve<br>
\r
103 > $HOME here?</p>
\r
104 <p dir="ltr">realpath is used to follow, not overwrite symlinks.<br></p>
\r
106 --001a11369b0eed1d6904ef2ce417--
\r