1 Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3330431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:58:21 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1]
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id VK+ZRfvZAMJa for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:58:19 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934B3431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:58:19 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33F32160D
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:58:17 +0100 (CET)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
\r
26 :subject:reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=
\r
27 postfix; bh=DMmON/k157ZPMUTlhfVtc4zcwqc=; b=V7+WNcfh/Lp0XcFLQkAi
\r
28 Bp39FacYnw2surLnGhmhLagNtZ8HTZsaUqtQZ+tDPtSEsjVF/Y0304UvbWfVsHCc
\r
29 /gjQtYI5h7KZRiqQp828QaYGKtzLF1xHW4eiN9PKIl6doqAjCqwmkFMHNqElGDR8
\r
30 kB1qeeWOUvkECV6Tlt7wAqc=
\r
31 Received: from maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net
\r
33 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
34 (No client certificate requested)
\r
35 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA
\r
36 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:58:17 +0100 (CET)
\r
37 From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
\r
38 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
39 Subject: Sort by newest first from notmuch-hello ?
\r
40 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
41 (i486-slackware-linux-gnu)
\r
42 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:15:42 +0100
\r
43 Message-ID: <m2obu04n6p.fsf@kcals.intra.maillard.im>
\r
45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
46 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
47 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
49 Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
\r
50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
51 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
58 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
59 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:58:22 -0000
\r
63 I am running latest release (0.11).
\r
64 I have set notmuch-search-oldest-first to t. When doing M-x
\r
65 notmuch-search, messages order does not respect this setting -i.e newest
\r
66 com firts -. On the other hand, from notmuch-hello I get expected
\r
69 How can this be more "consistent" ?
\r
71 By the way, am I alone having hundreds thousand messages ? If not, what
\r
72 would you thing setting this variable to `nil' by default ? Having first
\r
73 messages at the top would be more usefull that scrolling down really far
\r