1 Return-Path: <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D144431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:54:55 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id UsOJPYi6XUUg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:54:55 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 X-Greylist: delayed 1912 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra;
\r
18 Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:54:54 PST
\r
19 Received: from walrus.jabberwocky.com (walrus.jabberwocky.com [173.9.29.57])
\r
20 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
21 (No client certificate requested)
\r
22 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4387431FB5
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:54:54 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: from grover.home.jabberwocky.com (grover.home.jabberwocky.com
\r
25 [172.24.84.28]) (authenticated bits=0)
\r
26 by walrus.jabberwocky.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0I3MvV1011930
\r
27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
\r
28 Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:22:58 -0500
\r
29 Subject: Re: including the entire fingerprint of the issuer in an OpenPGP
\r
31 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
\r
32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
33 From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <4D34F133.3000807@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
35 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:22:57 -0500
\r
36 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
37 Message-Id: <2885367E-D215-4BE7-983D-C82C55C64B0F@jabberwocky.com>
\r
38 References: <4D34F133.3000807@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
39 To: IETF OpenPGP Working Group <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>
\r
40 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
\r
41 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:27:17 -0800
\r
42 Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
43 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
46 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
47 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
48 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
49 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
50 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
51 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
53 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
54 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
55 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:54:55 -0000
\r
57 On Jan 17, 2011, at 8:47 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
\r
59 > Would there be any objection to a new subpacket type for OpenPGPv4 =
\r
61 > would include the remaining 96 bits of the issuer's fingerprint? (the
\r
62 > "high 96" proposal)
\r
64 > Alternately, what about a new subpacket type that simply includes the
\r
65 > entire 160 bits of the issuer's fingerprint? (the "full fingerprint"
\r
68 I like this idea. I would do it as "full fingerprint" myself. The =
\r
69 difference in storage between 160 bits and 96 bits is all of 8 bytes. I =
\r
70 think the simplicity of being able to say the whole fingerprint is in =
\r
71 there is worth a measly 8 bytes.
\r
73 Do we necessarily need a new subpacket type for this? It could pretty =
\r
74 easily be a notation.
\r