1 Return-Path: <racin@free.fr>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B31431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:34:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.305 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[AWL=-0.306, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id A+rf+kzF0OFd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:34:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.5])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E9A431FAE
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:34:45 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
21 by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40814D4811D;
\r
22 Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:34:37 +0100 (CET)
\r
23 Received: from zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net (zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net
\r
25 by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FED1D48203;
\r
26 Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:34:30 +0100 (CET)
\r
27 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:34:28 +0100 (CET)
\r
29 To: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
\r
31 <899270357.3379251266482068203.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net>
\r
32 In-Reply-To: <20100218021128.GB7650@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
\r
34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
35 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
36 X-Originating-IP: [132.166.135.72]
\r
37 X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0
\r
38 (Linux)/5.0.15_GA_2815.UBUNTU8_64)
\r
39 X-Authenticated-User: racin@free.fr
\r
40 Cc: Ben Gamari <bgamari@gmail.com>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
41 Subject: Re: [notmuch] Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git)
\r
42 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
45 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
46 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
48 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
49 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
50 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
52 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
54 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:34:49 -0000
\r
57 ----- "martin f krafft" <madduck@madduck.net> a =C3=A9crit :
\r
59 > Except I fear that as soon as we allow manipulation of the local
\r
60 > store, we'll potentially run into this problem:
\r
62 > http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/001114.html
\r
63 > id:20100112045152.GA15275@lapse.rw.madduck.net
\r
65 I don't understand the problem. Why not just letting all "inbox" mails in a=
\r
67 and use git only when they have been explicit archived? This way, mails are=
\r
68 added to git only if we want
\r
69 to save them, and we rarely (never?) need to remove mail from the git store=
\r
71 is also much easier to do from the maildir. This mail flow would make much =
\r