68/cef6f11fdf997afc1c2ba1e76223e234d6688c

   1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC8C429E22\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 May 2011 17:57:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id wWGh36mSLDrW for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Sun,  8 May 2011 17:57:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
  17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
  18         [131.215.239.19])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D5C431FB5\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 May 2011 17:57:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
  21 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
  22         by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DB766E02E3;\r
  23         Sun,  8 May 2011 17:57:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
  24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
  25 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-98-149-172-122.socal.res.rr.com\r
  26         [98.149.172.122]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
  27         by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7498866E0122;\r
  28         Sun,  8 May 2011 17:57:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
  29 Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
  30         id E45D2303; Sun,  8 May 2011 17:57:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
  31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  32 To: James Vasile <james@hackervisions.org>,\r
  33         Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  34 Subject: Re: release-candidate/0.6\r
  35 In-Reply-To: <87bozfpemp.fsf@softwarefreedom.org>\r
  36 References: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
  37         <87bozfpemp.fsf@softwarefreedom.org>\r
  38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
  39         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  40 Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 17:57:48 -0700\r
  41 Message-ID: <87k4e0g06r.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
  42 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  43 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  44         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  47 Precedence: list\r
  48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  49         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  51         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  56         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  57 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 00:57:56 -0000\r
  58 \r
  59 --=-=-=\r
  60 \r
  61 On Fri, 06 May 2011 19:56:30 -0400, James Vasile <james@hackervisions.org> wrote:\r
  62 > I sent two patches to the list on March 16.  They were a bug fix to\r
  63 > allow notmuch to correctly handle some poorly formatted email.  Nobody\r
  64 > ever replied, but I'd like to see the bug fixed nonetheless, as it\r
  65 > results in unreadable mail.  Since I've actually seen such mail in the\r
  66 > wild, I'd like to see Notmuch handle it.\r
  67 \r
  68 Hey, James.  Florian Friesdorf sent in a patch to sanitize the output of\r
  69 notmuch search, which I think is the issue that you're patches were also\r
  70 dealing with.  Florian's patch has be pushed to my\r
  71 release-candidate/0.6.  Can you see if your issue is fixed there?  If\r
  72 not maybe you could try submitting a new patch that would apply to the\r
  73 release-candidate/0.6 head.\r
  74 \r
  75 Thanks.\r
  76 \r
  77 jamie.\r
  78 \r
  79 --=-=-=\r
  80 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  81 \r
  82 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  83 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
  84 \r
  85 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNxzwNAAoJEO00zqvie6q8gXgP/jVNeygxTYUA0fayMfX593Pu\r
  86 C0AdBAlNJ6uaFEVAyzlObjh+L7gLhdAOOSgM+Uw7tRV8YEUIjRR1UTPVxT2n76jh\r
  87 3ruMmt7w1/mLKZRfQQOhGS65mM04XEBDekQmDvOlVdPF/d5sMNZrKSJNcwMxiqwG\r
  88 LOXZGj9RX1yktAQE5v+jMSGbKyyYt8X4TPKU17a7/r9r3hhYrKuPK+eszItescW+\r
  89 zUVxrnslyRd6728VYWe8J+4rGd4wbyUoqi8yqTWZzFj8xIGMxeuQwBw+/3pT96lm\r
  90 LkZ1HN6sJ0Z4hythRVk7iKYbGoNyrNbdZB0DOw39cTpsHpSs7k5HyP+li+Uky77p\r
  91 eA5ZKL8ev4KV6Fy+sQGp//9XRc3sLeBU8nUCQQmQvfHeJiHUTphMtYdGIuhFOYar\r
  92 tCBZyiYb3DmxKNmoSE1lHY0xfCP0kbRQMGEAbtLu68ZW97wqRgyvK/XrCrHTSu1P\r
  93 pl7NbirekcmenV3eomOI9L1wglUWkM2JreqEtbnR1JHwDUkcOOsl469ceQuHtLCA\r
  94 noObdT7J6ylrpCh513Lf6bATx1cbq4ib/mhGXCM/wb5AQ/+GUihiQeivkbmURJDA\r
  95 mnlAbMf4bGwYPNX5nbRnUtziBajmakYn80CkoxCPZ8K25ZUdnIOOJZGySUKr3Q3i\r
  96 rdW2Y6MNo7sOYq0r/igi\r
  97 =+HrJ\r
  98 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  99 --=-=-=--\r