1 Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53934431FD0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1]
\r
13 autolearn=unavailable
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id oBMI8oMfE+J2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2C2431FB5
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11932C062;
\r
24 Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:19:24 +0200 (CEST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
\r
26 :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=qY/a54ItWgQoitwWDxDin3
\r
28 Q8OD8=; b=Qup6SfoXoEFFJFOabVbSbs3GdheojENArz0z7QP73mUA4zsN3U8xqG
\r
29 RZ0l2uUH4xSDg2AFb+006+V0+wsg1l7M64vLTc6GTLMzaCGzlt7ag1lzxAzSfNzB
\r
30 sODnxQPlC0YkntOL7MK6TAWFcG9v+W9fr2kkLIJmVmdelABuqQzVM=
\r
31 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
\r
32 :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id
\r
33 :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=Wxp9ggefZagjBizs
\r
34 fO8vVtldApVHEOf+D9OyXZrP6WWUa2F3FpjYX5FQwauQMniXlhgkOkBJ+n7VMXe5
\r
35 VHtwpoAaAycNX/zCqZuFYrBCjREjI2yqQKhKFUEWFEQsbLPtYz7JPisq4r9Kz5EB
\r
36 mZBmwzhtQjOtnPB5RWzeB0sjoMk=
\r
37 Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254])
\r
38 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
39 (No client certificate requested)
\r
40 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
\r
41 Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:19:23 +0200 (CEST)
\r
42 From: Xavier Maillard <xavier@maillard.im>
\r
43 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr>,
\r
44 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 Subject: Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <877hai3r82.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
47 References: <87ipzvk2xh.fsf@free.fr> <877hai3r82.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-133-gc509598 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
49 (i486-slackware-linux-gnu)
\r
50 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:30:09 +0200
\r
51 Message-ID: <m2y62vy7vy.fsf@gnu.org>
\r
53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
57 Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
59 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:19:33 -0000
\r
69 On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:23:41 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
\r
70 > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:20:26 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr> wrote:
\r
71 > > Maybe it would also be interesting to add a warning/assertion to check
\r
72 > > that all email adresses added to the database are correct email
\r
73 > > addresses? I.e. check that the `addr' variable in _index_address_mailbox
\r
74 > > always has a @. This check is in fact already done using the function
\r
75 > > strchr, but a bad value is explicitly ignored...
\r
77 > Hmm... we could add a warning like that. But I don't know how useful it
\r
78 > would actually be. (I, for one, am currently not seeing any warnings
\r
79 > From "notmuch new"---maybe I should fix that...).
\r
81 > Since GMime is fixed upstream (as of version 2.4.18) another option
\r
82 > would be to simply make the notmuch build system require a sufficiently
\r
83 > new version of GMime in order to build.
\r
85 > What do you think?
\r
87 My vote goes to the latter. Cleaner and really simple solution.
\r