62/4eb0893fd3f803734a29bf1b56b70a09c73ffb

   1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196F8431FD0\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:58:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id ELV8nkMnY4V9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:58:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
  17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
  18         [131.215.239.19])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3951C431FB6\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:58:52 -0700 (PDT)\r
  21 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
  22         by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9749C66E0212;\r
  23         Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:58:51 -0700 (PDT)\r
  24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
  25 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-98-149-172-122.socal.res.rr.com\r
  26         [98.149.172.122]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
  27         by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BAB66E0207;\r
  28         Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:58:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
  29 Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
  30         id 5FC1A7C9; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:58:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
  31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  32 To: Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  33 Subject: Re: date_relative in notmuch-search\r
  34 In-Reply-To: <20110714222258.GA11914@brick.lan>\r
  35 References: <20110714222258.GA11914@brick.lan>\r
  36 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-353-gb44d56e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
  37         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  38 Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:58:45 -0700\r
  39 Message-ID: <87oc0v4jt6.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
  40 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  41 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  42         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  43 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  44 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  45 Precedence: list\r
  46 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  47         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  48 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  49         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  50 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  51 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  52 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  53 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  54         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  55 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:58:54 -0000\r
  56 \r
  57 --=-=-=\r
  58 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  59 \r
  60 On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:22:58 +0100, Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@googlemai=\r
  61 l.com> wrote:\r
  62 > I wodered why "notmuch search --format=3Djson" doesn't provide the "date_=\r
  63 relative" field for\r
  64 > results, as the show command does.\r
  65 >=20\r
  66 > I'm not expert on notmuch internals but I got it working like this:\r
  67 \r
  68 Hi, Patrick.  I think this is a very reasonable patch.  However, there\r
  69 are a couple of things you need to do to get this patch accepted.\r
  70 \r
  71 First of all, you should send the patch to the list in a format that\r
  72 will allow it to be applied directly to a git repo.  In particular, it\r
  73 needs to include a good commit log message.  Look at using git send-mail\r
  74 to send it to the list, which will format it correctly.\r
  75 \r
  76 Also, I'm quite sure this patch will require a couple of changes to the\r
  77 test suite.  You should submit a patch that changes the test suite to\r
  78 reflect the desired changes *first*, followed by the patch that fixes\r
  79 the issue.\r
  80 \r
  81 Thanks!\r
  82 \r
  83 jamie.\r
  84 \r
  85 --=-=-=\r
  86 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  87 \r
  88 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  89 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
  90 \r
  91 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOIGO2AAoJEO00zqvie6q8ORkP/RBb/+gWm40DAq29Y538DAOe\r
  92 5/BMnUP+zuNuMYUDjRWIrxVvgNjXGpXQpRBdueuxhEMPKiCNC48nioIncsNJo1k8\r
  93 RHwVk9iPlZXd8mtFxvfOzQoWp4UNjZ7B6n53xfvsHH8GrTUS/ld1hmGxetrsF7Qr\r
  94 Ri8xQZtSq3WpPDj6kj+xfw9hSkQIZHK+ncHldBhw7gh1oJfL1WM7D8dzueqd1SVg\r
  95 V+EvB7F/2F/oolUz1fx7OhDpyp7KQyf2V8OMQc3LzFBLrOow7XJFxM6J1ruqdlP0\r
  96 da9YxvVfjxiuVSdaOfwzm5PYkN6lY+bOHRsP5U4hE8p2NQkDpzFwLIjkWfLcs5zR\r
  97 qpllCQeySk/YxpxhS5MHQwbhklkvF8XhQDfrlCWGMcf+7pouvhC/yvOAXIS3rO+n\r
  98 j35UXqs/BJ1W/qLlO1C2BkR1zLRcJSYg3aYZNchuXKt2eWVRBpCL/qM8lqYutsWo\r
  99 MeLZ6kwDjM9tNNBavTllJGEaUDI9RfUCa3UHIDRfD5EQQe+s3IiR4kP97DS8qK+p\r
 100 FKzLmFptZOthuwKp/LeFXJPn8XxcMYculpXm4ffBZ74H0V+2y4ZUZeVPraFN3fBS\r
 101 0EvPGSFJIvAATKek1A71sI1nNjjpiAEiF+f/WW1Y5Rx89HWrdwu9moMUxWTafkAc\r
 102 XpySAAOiNX3vF6sNcKJk\r
 103 =rkTD\r
 104 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 105 --=-=-=--\r