1 Return-Path: <sojka@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5940429E42
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:18:42 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id qGbAYiqjZHXX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:18:38 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C441C431E62
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:18:38 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])
\r
21 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C611E19F3600;
\r
22 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:18:37 +0100 (CET)
\r
23 X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS
\r
24 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])
\r
25 by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,
\r
27 with ESMTP id 9btytyhE69PC; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:18:32 +0100 (CET)
\r
28 Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])
\r
29 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842AE19F35E3;
\r
30 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:18:32 +0100 (CET)
\r
31 Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (cable-86-56-3-85.cust.telecolumbus.net
\r
32 [86.56.3.85]) (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)
\r
33 by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F856660968;
\r
34 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:18:32 +0100 (CET)
\r
35 Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.77)
\r
36 (envelope-from <sojka@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>)
\r
37 id 1Rxo7L-0004z5-CH; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:18:31 +0100
\r
38 From: Michal Sojka <sojka@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
\r
39 To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: Fix display of highlighted line in
\r
42 In-Reply-To: <87wr7ngand.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
43 References: <87mx8lpd5o.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
44 <1329239387-6300-1-git-send-email-sojka@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
\r
45 <87wr7ngand.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
46 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+196~g4e14806 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
47 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
48 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:18:31 +0100
\r
49 Message-ID: <87ehtvheig.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
52 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:28:25 -0800
\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
57 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
65 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:18:42 -0000
\r
67 On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
\r
70 > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:09:47 +0100, Michal Sojka <sojka@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote:
\r
71 > > When notmuch-search-line-faces is used to set background color in search
\r
72 > > results, the highlight of the current line is not always displayed
\r
73 > > correctly. This patch fixes that by increasing the priority property of
\r
74 > > the highlight overlay.
\r
77 > How about changing `notmuch-search-color-line' to use text properties
\r
78 > instead of overlays? Then hl-line overlay would take priority over it
\r
79 > without these changes.
\r
81 > See [1] by David Edmondson on why text properties are better in
\r
82 > general. I plan to use text properties here to simplify updating the
\r
83 > face when tags are changed.
\r
85 Hmm, I always wondered why notmuch uses overlays even if Elisp manual
\r
86 says they don't scale. I remember that I wanted to replace that long
\r
87 time ago, but there was some problem, which I forgot. Maybe it was the
\r
88 invisibility David mentions. I guess there is some invisible text in
\r
89 search output, isn't it?
\r