1 Return-Path: <chm.duquesne@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3173E431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id 6-LeeR1NBQcJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D195B431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by ieak12 with SMTP id k12so6730954iea.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
\r
27 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
\r
28 bh=FhifCzkHN9oH4QPDNxRjupCtPmUQl1w/YwmH01DcnA4=;
\r
29 b=Skx9w7gJOv5jCBJ4UyvMxdobW4aS/MghmdAjdwRKZeOhnKfchL6sz0KqkETwz8vXBR
\r
30 X0j4zTubrzQpQ/7C8tHlSMTyaL2zLTzqbvxreeFwcg8UBxFZm0d+t7XJND1ywvQbaQks
\r
31 m9bxdtn35h8Cco0If6nAshEaleGutalDTpJnF0C0Kg7pyrwCa9GlE6rs204XtLRsvNFh
\r
32 6R6Rpl9bqC++p/Z9AL670NY9gI+wnngg+qSsnaODK3XGrJb7XcGQJjNmcYsGspOUrXwo
\r
33 U2c+O7+j/mhylcYCewhtzo5TfDBq0YXhWbx/ykTXoKuYIn2JZilvIIBhdAOAa2LDV7JM
\r
35 Received: by 10.50.195.194 with SMTP id ig2mr27887199igc.24.1347612760209;
\r
36 Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
38 Sender: chm.duquesne@gmail.com
\r
39 Received: by 10.64.24.9 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
\r
40 In-Reply-To: <5052ECBC.30203@gmail.com>
\r
42 <CA+y5gghe68Sy6BK8FdeGbKEESFD_=2GQ+y+oZSYyt85oQqRuzA@mail.gmail.com>
\r
43 <CA+eQo_0nK1rL6DYu2ERqF3U=vZAO_XTpXDtzydHQqBtXqHUOxQ@mail.gmail.com>
\r
44 <CA+y5gghnzinnXiabFOEphAuWTJA5Uge9RtGbKu9ur5rP50i_5g@mail.gmail.com>
\r
45 <5052E1A9.8060503@gmail.com>
\r
46 <CAHLp1YkRfM9NGB9di9jMNwJbY1sFFjfUw1z8ZSCJ7e4Hz_3q0g@mail.gmail.com>
\r
47 <5052ECBC.30203@gmail.com>
\r
48 From: Christophe-Marie Duquesne <chmd@chmd.fr>
\r
49 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:52:19 +0200
\r
50 X-Google-Sender-Auth: L-SvnKGae6oW0nX4WZWOz81L398
\r
52 <CAHLp1Yn-wP+=R0otkEPWpDN6M_dq21SrwLTRnkLYtUdiT2YYsA@mail.gmail.com>
\r
53 Subject: Re: Better Gmail handling by not using Notmuch tags
\r
54 To: Rainer M Krug <R.M.Krug@gmail.com>
\r
55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
56 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org,Jeremy Nickurak <public-
\r
57 public-not-much-kexSNQTsIoD754YsiR0rpA-wOFGN7rlS/M9smdsby/KFg@plane.gmane.org>
\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
62 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 08:52:41 -0000
\r
72 On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Rainer M Krug <R.M.Krug@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
73 > An API seems to be the way to go, but that one only concerns the settings, not retrieving
\r
74 > information about individual emails.
\r
76 Oops. It seems that I misread that.
\r
78 > But that is definetly a job for somebody else - I am just throwing ideas out.
\r
80 It was a general "you".
\r