Re: [PATCH v4 09/16] index encrypted parts when asked.
[notmuch-archives.git] / 5e / c2672a6a632dd2e760535cb0005aec9b36b843
1 Return-Path: <jason@jasonwoof.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7D4431FD0\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id rH-dovlt2v7f for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
17 Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com (mail-qy0-f174.google.com\r
18         [209.85.216.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
19         (No client certificate requested)\r
20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526F7431FB6\r
21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
22 Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so2617827qyk.5\r
23         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
24 Received: by 10.224.194.194 with SMTP id dz2mr2495272qab.58.1314117554924;\r
25         Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
26 Received: from lemote.jasonwoof.com (rrcs-50-75-61-2.nys.biz.rr.com\r
27         [50.75.61.2])\r
28         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m11sm83657qcw.7.2011.08.23.09.39.13\r
29         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
30         Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
31 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:39:09 -0400\r
32 From: Jason Woofenden <jason@jasonwoof.com>\r
33 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
34 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] add user friendly date range search\r
35 Message-ID: <20110823163908.GD2968@lemote.jasonwoof.com>\r
36 Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
37 References: <cover.1312964528.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
38         <87bovryqp0.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
39 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
41 Content-Disposition: inline\r
42 In-Reply-To: <87bovryqp0.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
43 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
46 Precedence: list\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
48         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
50         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
55         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:39:19 -0000\r
57 \r
58 Here's my thoughts on date/range syntax:\r
59 \r
60 I think: date:monday should show only e-mails that arrived on\r
61 monday (not also emails that arrived since then.) Because that's\r
62 what it looks like it does.\r
63 \r
64 I think a very common use of date ranges will be from some time\r
65 until now. So I'd like that to be easy. I suggest this syntax:\r
66 \r
67         since:monday\r
68 \r
69 which would be a shorthand for:\r
70 \r
71         date:monday-00:00:00..now\r
72 \r
73 If that's not a popular idea, then we should at least be able to\r
74 use this shorthand for the same:\r
75 \r
76         date:monday..\r
77 \r
78 Also, I think it's quite valuable to have "yesterday" work as a\r
79 date.\r
80 \r
81 That's all.\r
82 \r
83          - Jason\r