1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6622D431FD6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:25:28 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id dL-X9rHrMgHR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:25:27 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CFB0431FD2
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:25:27 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: by werb10 with SMTP id b10so3759100wer.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:25:26 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by 10.216.132.19 with SMTP id n19mr1542540wei.31.1327433126115;
\r
25 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:25:26 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net
\r
27 (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25])
\r
28 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n3sm55457495wiz.9.2012.01.24.11.25.24
\r
29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
30 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:25:24 -0800 (PST)
\r
31 Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000)
\r
32 id DAA7D9FD47; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:25:22 +0000 (GMT)
\r
33 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
34 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
35 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] emacs: Don't return the button from
\r
36 `notmuch-show-insert-part-header'.
\r
37 In-Reply-To: <87k44hym3i.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
38 References: <1327052612-1040-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
39 <1327409620-10133-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
40 <1327409620-10133-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
41 <87k44hym3i.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
42 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+105~g08b3b0f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1
\r
43 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
44 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
45 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:25:19 +0000
\r
46 Message-ID: <cun8vkwq4ww.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
48 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
49 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
51 ALoCoQkhjAyCaG3679ftzt6ePYyLo3XCB12Ip8M5AbtWguoLkoA8q3Tr7ox/9LVkmVe7eYyEjPTZ
\r
52 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
53 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
55 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
56 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
57 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
58 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
59 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
60 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
61 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
62 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
63 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
64 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:25:28 -0000
\r
67 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
68 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
70 On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:46:57 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestr=
\r
72 > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:53:38 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
73 > > Instead, allow the caller to specify some parameters for the
\r
74 > > button. Rework `notmuch-show-insert-part-multipart/signed' and
\r
75 > > `notmuch-show-insert-part-multipart/encrypted' accordingly.
\r
77 > Hi, David. I was thinking about this, and it seems to me that returning
\r
78 > the button itself is useful. I can imagine in the future that it might
\r
79 > be useful to be able to modify the button after you've created. Maybe
\r
80 > it's inconvenient to specify all button parameters at creation time.
\r
82 > Is there a reason it's really necessary to make this change? Can't
\r
83 > callers just ignore the returned button if they don't care about it
\r
84 > further? I can see that maybe it's nice to be able to specify
\r
85 > parameters at creation time, but I'm not sure why that requires throwing
\r
86 > out the returned object as well.
\r
88 Patches 2 and 3 in that series can result in the button not being
\r
92 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
94 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
95 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
97 iEYEARECAAYFAk8fBZ8ACgkQaezQq/BJZRas+ACePCcGIo7tkqXJed1U0kvOcx+7
\r
98 K+wAnAhFhvKbNJlZRX6fxV0WqlyLcVtb
\r
100 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r